I agree with Lars, all the Italian companies have the chamber mouth too small, but I have two newer Piettas, one a .36 and the other a .44, that shoot excellent, espescially the .36, so I wouldn't worry about it. The Ubertis will be wrong too. The chamber mouths on Italian cartridge guns (1873's) are wrong too. That's why they make chamber mouth reamers. Rugers are not exempt from this, as many of their cartridge guns (Blackhawks, Vaqueros) are made with improper diameter chamber mouths.
With cap 'n ball, a slightly smaller chamber mouth is OK, because you want to cut a little lead ring, to ensure you are getting a good chamber seal, to prevent chain firing. Additionally, make certain to use pure lead balls or conicals, and the soft lead will "upset" upon firing and expand sufficiently to fill the rifling.
If you look at original cartridge guns , you will find great variations in chamber mouth and barrel groove diameters from gun to gun, even from the same manufacturer, but ammunition of the period was made with soft, pure lead bullets, that upset under pressure to cover the sins of poor manufacturing tolerances.
The chamber dimension problem has been more apparent in recent history, when shooters started using hardcast bullets to cut down on leading when using smokeless powder. The hard alloys don't upset. Another reason to avoid the new fangled heathen powder.
To summarize, don't spend the extra $100 for a Uberti, they aren't any better in regard to chamber tolerances, and use pure lead for your balls/conicals.