Did you really argue that white people never raped or tortured or murdered any indians? You think whites aren't capable of atrocities? I fully understand warfare, but to say no soldier, or settler, or buffalo hunter, or fur trader..etc, in the entire history of the west ever did anything bad to an indian is kind of odd. Whites along with every other race of human being are quite capable of pretty horrible things. They are all humans. Didn't say the indians were peace loving as a whole. Most were very war oriented. But they were just people. You refer to the indians as savage. Do you not think that stomping indian babies to death with boot heels is also savage? Believe me, I'm no liberal. But I also know that a lot of whites in the 1800s didn't consider the indians to be human either. Wasn't it William Sherman who said "The only good indian is a dead indian"? If you want to call me names and say I am sniveling, that is fine, but facts are facts. Whites are kind of brutal to each other too. Look at the Civil War. Lot of atrocities on both sides. You mention the SS. They were white too. All I am saying is, no matter what race you want to talk about ( white, black, indian, asian, hispanic) there are documented atrocities comitted by all of them. I have studied warfare from the F&I all the way to Vietnam. All sides in all wars do things they shouldn't. Not every soldier mind you, but some. War is a terrible thing. You rightfully point out that the PC police are covering up facts about the indian wars, but you paint a picture of moral superiorrty of whites over the "savages". We are ALL capable these things. Not trying to fight, just pointing out facts.