1860 Amry Conversion kit

[Cheyenne]

 

How do all,  trying to see how much interest there would be in a conversion kit for the 1860 Army and which style would be preferred by the potential customers.

Early Richards style with the rear sight integeral to the conversion ring, or
a Richards-Mason type with the hammer remaining unaltered and the rear sight staying on the hammer nose.

In a Richards, after mounting the ring you'd have to cut the load channel and cut down the hammer nose.

In a Richards-Mason you'd mount the ring, then cut the load channel.

In either, the firing pin will be mounted in the ring with a ferrel.

[J.W.Neely]

50-50 , exit polls look like it could go any which-a-way.

[Cheyenne]

It'll be more fun watching this poll than any during the past election though!  thanks for responding JW, now look at the one on pricing and let's see how it fairs. 

[Advertising]

[J.D.Cayhill]

We came...We saw...We voted. I do like those conversions.

[Qball]

I prefer nippels
I mean unalterd cap & ball style