Recent Posts

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10
51
The Darksider's Den / Re: How did we get these "Calibers"?
« Last post by Abilene on Yesterday at 12:51:42 PM »

But is that '61 barrel on your beautiful conversion a Percussion barrel or one intended for a conversion revolver?

Yes, that's what came on the conversion.  I only changed the grips to Navy

After you telling me that the Type IIs in .38 Special are actually on the "original" correctly sized frame I am seriously considering getting a pair to use as practice guns since they will feel and handle the same.  ...

Did I say that?  If I did it was earlier before I discovered that the Uberti Navy cylinders are in fact 0.1" larger than originals.  I have no idea how any of the frames compare to originals.  The frame does not have to be made larger for the Ubertis anyway, except for the recoil shield part so that the bore axis can be a little higher to allow for the larger cylinders

Your IMGUR photos do not show up for me on that last post. Edit: they show up on phone
52
Please check one (or up to three above).  You can change your votes later if you want to.

  • Please tell us a bit more about your lube and journey to get there if there is one.
  • If you buy your bullets already lubed please tell us what the caster claims it is and whether or not it works well.
  • Do you get any leading in your bore, not Powder fouling, but real leading?  This is for both those that lube their own and those that by store bought.

~Mako
53
The Darksider's Den / Re: How did we get these "Calibers"?
« Last post by Mako on Yesterday at 11:20:24 AM »
No.  I did not say that at all.
Your question: "Are the frames for the Richard-Mason .44 and .45 Conversions the same as the .44 and .45 Richards Type 2 Frames?"
My answer: Yes - only the barrel assemblies differ.

Abilene,
Thank you, I wasn't trying to put words in your mouth, I just wanted to make sure I understood.  That is what I have understood ever since I got my pair of Type IIs right after they came out.

But is that '61 barrel on your beautiful conversion a Percussion barrel or one intended for a conversion revolver?

After you telling me that the Type IIs in .38 Special are actually on the "original" correctly sized frame I am seriously considering getting a pair to use as practice guns since they will feel and handle the same.  The percussion revolvers are not a a disadvantage in a match since there is a lot of time between stages but it sure extends my range time when practicing.  In fact I believe that cartridge guns may catch on and even be here to stay (we will see...Wild Bill wasn't fully convinced).

Truth be told and as I have said in the past the .44 Army with a round ball is basically a .38 Spl in power.  Tom even has a nice 140gr Ø.358 BP bullet design that would be almost an analog to the .44 Army load with equivalent powder with a heavy crimped bullet. 

The lack of a crimp to build pressure upon firing is the one downside to the percussion revolvers.  You are limited to the fit between the bullet/ball and the chamber for your initial resistance.  I could chronograph the normal loads and duplicate the velocity with the cartridge. It wouldn't surprise if they wouldn't be equivalent with a "19gr" (17.5 by weight) I know will fit under that 140gr bullet  That bullet depth from the base to crimp groove is almost identical to the .38 Snakebite Grease Wagon I normally use.  But, just what I need is another mold, I just ordered that Snakebite analog design I submitted to him.  The original Big Lube Snakebite and the new one he's making actually weigh 160gr even though almost everyone refers to them as 158gr (even me on my loaded boxes).  That is in soft lead, even the 20:1 ratio or wheel weight lead bullets weigh over 159gr. The old fellow I was buying from a couple of years ago thought I wanted "hard cast" bullets since that is what everyone talks about.  He later cast  500 for me with a softer but not dead soft full Lead alloy. I lube my own with my homemade lube (I actually use my "Summer" formulation for bullets and use either my Summer or Winter lube based on outside temperatures.  Summer formulation is mainly adding more paraffin in place of reduced mutton tallow.




My normal .44 load spouts (marketed as 30gr) on my powder flasks throw about 28.5gr by weight (Goex 3F) of the same powder. I have a "25gr" and a "15gr" spout as well but I can't remember what they actually throw weightwise with Goex 3F.

I have tried the smaller "25gr spout" and couldn't tell much difference in impact point or recoil.  I just went back to the "30gr spouts"  because the that "30gr" load is actually very inefficient and spews a LOT of burning powder out of the muzzle making a spectacular fireball and stream of fire towards the target.  If you're gonna go big, go big!  However, sometimes on a humid windless morning I have resorted to 25gr (probably 23 by weight) because the targets are totally obscured by the 2nd or third shot.  I will admit I have wimped out after a couple of stages of shooting blind and reduced my pistola loads to what most mortals shoot.  I might add I use homemade greased Wads (homemade and thoroughly soaked in Mutton Tallow/Bees Wax/Paraffin Lube) between the ball and powder for all percussion loads whether .44 or .36 caliber.

Lubed wads on left:


~Mako
54
Tall Tales / Re: May we move on, for coffee and chat ?
« Last post by Johnny McCrae on Yesterday at 10:24:22 AM »
The Boss is letting me cook a few things, mostly my baked Salmon and stuff on the grill. She let me cook this recipe I found on YouTube. It's tasty and easy to make: 

Actually, you can put anything you want in it. I've been adding Mushrooms and Ham. Atached is a picture of my last masterpiece. The War Department liked  it.
55
Tall Tales / Re: May we move on, for coffee and chat ?
« Last post by Major 2 on Yesterday at 09:54:27 AM »
Thanks, Slim
The heat is on here another day in upper 90's wind about 12 mph, and 95% humidity @ 3PM
feels like hair dryer outside.
We are about 2" short on rain.

The good news is the High will move off, heat will break, we should be back to our normal for May mid 80's by Saturday.

56
Tall Tales / Re: May we move on, for coffee and chat ?
« Last post by Major E A Sterner on Yesterday at 09:35:03 AM »
Thanks Slim, had a buttermilk english muffin for breakfast, was pretty good.Going to try the sourdough next.
57
Tall Tales / Re: May we move on, for coffee and chat ?
« Last post by Silver Creek Slim on Yesterday at 07:17:39 AM »
Morning y'all.
Coffee and tea are hot.

'Tis 46 and partly sunny. "Cooler. Mostly cloudy with a chance of showers. Highs in the lower 60s. Northeast wind 10 to 15 mph. Chance of rain 30 percent."

Slim
58
The Winchester Model 1873 / Re: Recreating the original .32WCF loading
« Last post by U.S.M.R. on Yesterday at 04:31:55 AM »
Midway has nickel plated Starline.32-20 brass.
59
The Winchester Model 1876 / Re: how long have you had a 76 rifle?
« Last post by Baltimore Ed on May 08, 2024, 06:47:15 PM »
Picked up my 1876 RCMP .45-60 in 2015.
60
The Darksider's Den / Re: How did we get these "Calibers"?
« Last post by Abilene on May 08, 2024, 05:43:04 PM »
Abilene,
Are you telling me that Uberti has the frames for the.44 and .45 Richards-Mason conversions more or less correct dimension wise  and they just went nuts with the Richards Type II frames and Cylinders?  I always thought all of the large caliber frames for cartridge conversion guns that Uberti made were oversize....

No.  I did not say that at all.
Your question: "Are the frames for the Richard-Mason .44 and .45 Conversions the same as the .44 and .45 Richards Type 2 Frames?"
My answer: Yes - only the barrel assemblies differ.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10
SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk
© 1995 - 2023 CAScity.com