Author Topic: Comparing science and socialism  (Read 707 times)

Offline redcliffsw

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5711
    • View Profile
Comparing science and socialism
« on: November 14, 2009, 09:09:29 AM »

Offline Diane Amberg

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12329
    • View Profile
Re: Comparing science and socialism
« Reply #1 on: November 14, 2009, 10:43:14 AM »
So the fetus really start talking (crying) in a known language  in the womb? And then they stop after birth?Then why is a child's first word, much later, such a big deal ?Sorry, don't buy that part.

Offline Sarah

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 544
    • View Profile
Re: Comparing science and socialism
« Reply #2 on: November 14, 2009, 11:00:18 AM »
So the fetus really start talking (crying) in a known language  in the womb? And then they stop after birth?Then why is a child's first word, much later, such a big deal ?Sorry, don't buy that part.

I think there's a big difference between crying and actual talking.  But babies do have cries for different things and a mama can always tell what kind of cry it is.  But at any rate, I think the point is is that they are living human being regardless of where they are, be they in the womb or out, and that all life is sacred.

Offline srkruzich

  • The Souths Gonna Rise Again... In Kansas!
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4277
  • The world doesn't have enough Goats in it!
    • View Profile
Re: Comparing science and socialism
« Reply #3 on: November 14, 2009, 11:11:23 AM »
So the fetus really start talking (crying) in a known language  in the womb? And then they stop after birth?Then why is a child's first word, much later, such a big deal ?Sorry, don't buy that part.
that is not what the article says. It said they cry i the mother tounge.   That being the tones and sounds of the native language.  It specifically said french babys start low and increase in tone and pitch just like french speaking.  The germans start in a high tone pitch and it decreases.  Their babies do the same thing.   And they continue this after birth.

As Sarah said, live is sacred and precious, and this country has become a third world country where life has no meaning.  We see the evidence in the millions of our children that have been murdered over the years. 

Curb your politician.  We have leash laws you know.

Offline Diane Amberg

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12329
    • View Profile
Re: Comparing science and socialism
« Reply #4 on: November 14, 2009, 11:45:57 AM »
Of course life is precious, but I'm always surprised at the length some people will go to "prove" their case. That's pretty flimsy stuff.

Offline Sarah

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 544
    • View Profile
Re: Comparing science and socialism
« Reply #5 on: November 14, 2009, 02:34:32 PM »
Of course life is precious, but I'm always surprised at the length some people will go to "prove" their case. That's pretty flimsy stuff.

There's much better evidence out there, but, generally speaking, if someone is bound and determined to get an abortion, no amount of evidence is going to change their mind.  At that point, pretty much all they're thinking about is themselves, UNLESS, there's a medical problem and then I can't say as I blame them. 

Offline Diane Amberg

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12329
    • View Profile
Re: Comparing science and socialism
« Reply #6 on: November 14, 2009, 02:51:39 PM »
I agree.

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk