Ivermectin

Started by Wake-up!, September 12, 2021, 08:22:09 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Wake-up!

Here's a 24-minute video about its history, use, and safety;  https://rumble.com/vlpecw-the-story-of-ivermectin.html

If you listen you will be hard put to find a downside. It is safe, it works to treat both parasitic and viral infections, it works to prevent both parasitic and viral infections, and it is cheap.

I asked my M.D. for a prescription so I could have Ivermectin on my shelf. He won't do it. In refusing, he is supporting the censorship the video talks about. Apparently, patient need and care are not as important as the politics of censorship.

Why the censorship of Ivermectin? In addition to the video's story of Gilead Pharmaceutical, there is a second reason. The international vaccine's use under the Emergency Use Authorizations (EUA) would legally have to be halted. For an EUA to be legal, "There must be no adequate, approved and available alternative to the candidate product for diagnosing, preventing or treating the disease or condition." So approval of Ivermectin would stop the dog and pony vaccine show, and the vaccines would only become legal once they passed level 4 trials and that certainly won't happen in 2021, if it would happen at all, given the number of people that have died from the vaccine.

Why are the EUAs so important? Look for yourself at the billions GUARANTEED to the vaccination companies (besides Gilead story in the video) under the EUAs. That is what this is all about to Big Pharma. Just follow the money trail.

It's a dangerous world when corporate marketing determines public health policy. It's a crime and medical negligence when a M.D. makes patient care secondary to corporate profits. Fauci and M.D.s supporting him belong in jail.
The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people; it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government.

The greatest mistake in American history was letting government educate our children.
- Harry Browne, 1996/2000 Libertarian Party Presidential candidate

Wake-up!

"I also have overwhelming anger for the medical system and the doctor who treated my husband and, up to the day he died, still refused to give him the Ivermectin and told me he wasn't going to discuss it,"

More is found here;  https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-09-22-husband-father-dies-after-being-denied-ivermectin.html#

[Overwhelming anger? How about rage? This doctor has just committed murder. When the purge of Marxists in medicine comes, this man should have his license revoked, then be tried and escorted to the gallows for his unconscionable failure to treat his patient.]
The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people; it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government.

The greatest mistake in American history was letting government educate our children.
- Harry Browne, 1996/2000 Libertarian Party Presidential candidate

Wake-up!

The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people; it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government.

The greatest mistake in American history was letting government educate our children.
- Harry Browne, 1996/2000 Libertarian Party Presidential candidate

Wake-up!

There is a 41-page pdf file 'out there' called the Spartacus Letter. I suggest everyone read it and send it to friends. Yes, as stated below, it is highly technical, but also informative. Here is an excerpt from it on Ivermectin.

"India went against the instructions of the WHO and mandated the prophylactic usage of Ivermectin. They have almost completely eradicated COVID-19. The Indian Bar Association of Mumbai has brought criminal charges against WHO Chief Scientist Dr. Soumya Swaminathan for recommending against the use of Ivermectin.

Ivermectin is not "horse dewormer". Yes, it is sold in veterinary paste form as a dewormer for animals. It has also been available in pill form for humans for decades, as an antiparasitic drug.

The media have disingenuously claimed that because Ivermectin is an antiparasitic drug, it has no utility as an antivirus. This is incorrect. Ivermectin has utility as an antiviral. It blocks importin, preventing nuclear import, effectively inhibiting viral access to cell nuclei. Many drugs currently on the market have multiple modes of action. Ivermectin is one such drug. It is both antiparasitic and antiviral.

In Bangladesh, Ivermectin costs $1.80 for an entire 5-day course. Remdesivir, which is toxic to the liver, costs $3,120 for a 5-day course of the drug. Billions of dollars of utterly useless Remdesivir were sold to our governments on the taxpayer's dime, and it ended up being totally useless for treating hyperinflammatory COVID-19. The media has hardly even covered this at all.

The opposition to the use of generic Ivermectin is not based in science. It is purely financially and politically-motivated. An effective non-vaccine intervention would jeopardize the rushed FDA approval of patented vaccines and medicines for which the pharmaceutical industry stands to rake in billions upon billions of dollars in sales on an ongoing basis.

The majority of the public are scientifically illiterate and cannot grasp what any of this even means, thanks to a pathetic educational system that has miseducated them. You would be lucky to find 1 in 100 people who have even the faintest clue what any of this actually means."

[Apparently, there are a fair number of doctors, who refuse to write prescriptions for Ivermectin, that do not have the faintest clue, either.]
The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people; it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government.

The greatest mistake in American history was letting government educate our children.
- Harry Browne, 1996/2000 Libertarian Party Presidential candidate


SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk