Why is Washington Against Russia Bombing ISIS and Al-Qaeda?

[redcliffsw]

Unsurprisingly, the US mainstream media once again rushed to carry water for the US administration, with CNN's Christiane Amanpour pondering whether Russia answering the legitimate Syrian government's request for assistance would open itself up to war crimes charges! In Amanpour's world there is no crime in a year of bombing a sovereign state with not even a fig leaf UN resolution to back it up. The only crime is to resist the US empire.

https://www.lewrockwell.com/lrc-blog/why-is-washington-against-russia-bombing-isis-and-al-qaeda/#more-564323

[srkruzich]

Unsurprisingly, the US mainstream media once again rushed to carry water for the US administration, with CNN's Christiane Amanpour pondering whether Russia answering the legitimate Syrian government's request for assistance would open itself up to war crimes charges! In Amanpour's world there is no crime in a year of bombing a sovereign state with not even a fig leaf UN resolution to back it up. The only crime is to resist the US empire.

https://www.lewrockwell.com/lrc-blog/why-is-washington-against-russia-bombing-isis-and-al-qaeda/#more-564323

I asked the question why were we in it to begin with.  Syria ain't the US, and quite frankly why are we involved in their civil war when it started. This raghead in the white house decided that he had to get involved for some reason.  Couldn't leave it well enough alone. The only reason i can find is he wanted his buddies in isis to get into it

[redcliffsw]

And war is the engine that drives their Ponzi scheme to keep the economy going. 

Obama and the Republicans will keep things stirred-up over there and just about anywhere else.  They'd rather not waste a crisis, they want the benefits thereof.