Elk County Forum

General Category => Politics => Topic started by: redcliffsw on November 14, 2009, 09:09:29 AM

Title: Comparing science and socialism
Post by: redcliffsw on November 14, 2009, 09:09:29 AM

Star Parker
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=115969
Title: Re: Comparing science and socialism
Post by: Diane Amberg on November 14, 2009, 10:43:14 AM
So the fetus really start talking (crying) in a known language  in the womb? And then they stop after birth?Then why is a child's first word, much later, such a big deal ?Sorry, don't buy that part.
Title: Re: Comparing science and socialism
Post by: Sarah on November 14, 2009, 11:00:18 AM
Quote from: Diane Amberg on November 14, 2009, 10:43:14 AM
So the fetus really start talking (crying) in a known language  in the womb? And then they stop after birth?Then why is a child's first word, much later, such a big deal ?Sorry, don't buy that part.

I think there's a big difference between crying and actual talking.  But babies do have cries for different things and a mama can always tell what kind of cry it is.  But at any rate, I think the point is is that they are living human being regardless of where they are, be they in the womb or out, and that all life is sacred.
Title: Re: Comparing science and socialism
Post by: srkruzich on November 14, 2009, 11:11:23 AM
Quote from: Diane Amberg on November 14, 2009, 10:43:14 AM
So the fetus really start talking (crying) in a known language  in the womb? And then they stop after birth?Then why is a child's first word, much later, such a big deal ?Sorry, don't buy that part.
that is not what the article says. It said they cry i the mother tounge.   That being the tones and sounds of the native language.  It specifically said french babys start low and increase in tone and pitch just like french speaking.  The germans start in a high tone pitch and it decreases.  Their babies do the same thing.   And they continue this after birth.

As Sarah said, live is sacred and precious, and this country has become a third world country where life has no meaning.  We see the evidence in the millions of our children that have been murdered over the years. 

Title: Re: Comparing science and socialism
Post by: Diane Amberg on November 14, 2009, 11:45:57 AM
Of course life is precious, but I'm always surprised at the length some people will go to "prove" their case. That's pretty flimsy stuff.
Title: Re: Comparing science and socialism
Post by: Sarah on November 14, 2009, 02:34:32 PM
Quote from: Diane Amberg on November 14, 2009, 11:45:57 AM
Of course life is precious, but I'm always surprised at the length some people will go to "prove" their case. That's pretty flimsy stuff.

There's much better evidence out there, but, generally speaking, if someone is bound and determined to get an abortion, no amount of evidence is going to change their mind.  At that point, pretty much all they're thinking about is themselves, UNLESS, there's a medical problem and then I can't say as I blame them. 
Title: Re: Comparing science and socialism
Post by: Diane Amberg on November 14, 2009, 02:51:39 PM
I agree.