Author Topic: Navy Arms Henry...old vs newer?  (Read 176 times)

Offline Cowtown

  • Top Active Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 107
Navy Arms Henry...old vs newer?
« on: May 10, 2019, 08:15:59 am »
Greetings all,

It is my understanding that Navy Arms made 1860 Henrys early on that used some small parts that are dimensionally different than later Navy Arms 1860 Henry models. This creates parts interchangeability/compatibility issues.

It there a serial number range that easily denotes the older models to stay away from; an admonishment I have read and heard several times over the years? In other words, how does one ID an older Navy Arms firearm, specifically their iron frame Henry?

Thank you for any assistance.


Offline Tuolumne Lawman

  • CAS-L Ghost Rider
  • Top Active Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 2070
  • Grass Valley, CA in the Sierra Nevada Mountains
Re: Navy Arms Henry...old vs newer?
« Reply #1 on: May 10, 2019, 09:24:42 am »
In 1976, Navy Arms started producing the first 1860 Henry replicas, BEFORE Uberti.  They mad about 3,000.  The first 50 were in .44 Rimfire with double strikers, and the rest were in 44-40.  About 1,000 were made with 24" barrel, and the rest were with 22" carbine barrels.  I have one with a 24" barrel. After a couple years production moved to Uberti

NOTHING interchanges with the later Uberti produced ones.  The frame is smaller, the carrier is smaller, the barrel does not have a lock on the end of the magazine tube, and other items are different too.

I did a post last year on it:   https://www.cascity.com/forumhall/index.php/topic,61751.0.html
TUOLUMNE LAWMAN
CO. F, 12th Illinois Cavalry  SASS # 6127 Life * Spencer Shooting Society #43 * Motherlode Shootist Society #1 * River City Regulators

Offline Coffinmaker

  • Top Active Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 5160
Re: Navy Arms Henry...old vs newer?
« Reply #2 on: May 10, 2019, 09:31:56 am »
Well ....... Allow me to explain.  Early on, Navy Arms contracted for their own proprietary replica of the 1860 Henry.  The rifle was even Rim Fire.  Really close dimensionally to an Original Sample Example, but not quite.  Nothing from those rifles interchange with anything else.

Early on, in Uberti production, the 1860 Henry rifles were built to different dimensions as well.  The frame was smaller in length and all of the internal parts, while similar, were also different from later production.  Those parts DO NOT interchange and there are NO replacement parts for those guns.  Don't Break One.  The short frame guns were manufactured prior to 1994.

I don't think anyone except Uberti could give you a specific SN reference for the change.  The quickest method of ID for the "odd" guns is a quick measurement of the Carrier Block and its Mortice.  They are shorter.  When you get inside the gun, you immediately go "Huh ??  What's This??"  If you run into one of these guns, don't modify any parts.  There are NO replacement parts.

Hope this helps.

Whoops!!  Lawman beat me to the draw.

 
« Last Edit: May 10, 2019, 09:35:15 am by Coffinmaker »

Offline Cowtown

  • Top Active Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 107
Re: Navy Arms Henry...old vs newer?
« Reply #3 on: May 10, 2019, 09:57:24 am »
Thank you, gentlemen!

 ;D


Offline Tuolumne Lawman

  • CAS-L Ghost Rider
  • Top Active Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 2070
  • Grass Valley, CA in the Sierra Nevada Mountains
Re: Navy Arms Henry...old vs newer?
« Reply #4 on: May 10, 2019, 03:06:20 pm »
CM is correct. Early Uberti 1860s are different from later ones also.  Most noticeably shorter receivers and a shorter threaded barrel shank that screws into the receiver.
TUOLUMNE LAWMAN
CO. F, 12th Illinois Cavalry  SASS # 6127 Life * Spencer Shooting Society #43 * Motherlode Shootist Society #1 * River City Regulators

Offline Coffinmaker

  • Top Active Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 5160
Re: Navy Arms Henry...old vs newer?
« Reply #5 on: May 10, 2019, 03:25:30 pm »

The only suggestion I would have for the "older" guns would be to first order up some new manufacture springs and check for compatibility.  I would NOT go grinding on springs I had no Oopsies replacement for.

Offline Cowtown

  • Top Active Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 107
Re: Navy Arms Henry...old vs newer?
« Reply #6 on: May 12, 2019, 03:51:21 pm »
Well...  With all this information in mind I decided to pass on the Navy Arms not knowing exactly what I was getting myself into. As luck would have it the same day I found a Taylor's and Company, much newer 1860 Henry that will fit my needs quite nicely. Iron frame 44-40 at that.  I should acquire this early this week.  ;D