Trying to wrap my thoughts around this whole concept of who's who in SAA design manufacturing.
Colt themselves ceased manufacturing the SAA twice, in the ensuing War years & also due to Colts own perceived decline in sales and demand.
So, in the truest definition of the word , Colt is into the
reproduction of the SAA themselves.
Lets look at the Colt 1911 a moment ,are not the current and former 1911 manufacturers ( some 50 or more ) , excluding original Colt themselves not Clones ?
And isn't the current Series of Colt 1911 not a clone of the original , just as the current 3rd. generation SAA is of the original 1873 SAA ?
We as humans tend to label, and tend to set on pedestals some branding , I think of Omega & Rolex watches as a FINE Jewelry time piece.
But a Timex is a fine daily wear workingman's time piece .... It not a Clone of Omega or Rolex but does the job.
Ruger is not clone of the SAA , it is a variation on the theme, it works and is good workingman's option.
The Uberties & Pietta's are Replicas , they are in some cases closer to the original, they exist and sell in greater numbers because
they work and is very good workingman's option.
Colt owns the ( if you will ) pedestal, in branding the Single Action Army , one is paying as much or more for the BRAND as the product, (not to mention the supply & demand , union labor & Conn. labor demands costs )
I also find the idea of buying a Colt , Rolex , or even a Ferrari for posterity strange to me , I want shoot , wear or drive it.
I don't really care if 50 or 100 years from now someone happens to acquire it as un-fired, worn or driven !
It was mine once , and I was here once !
my 2 cents and about what it's worth