Got the latest 'Handloader' magazine with the article on Tin Star. Data is still scarce right now but as the powder becomes more available, this will change.
I'm going to load up some .44 Russian with it and see what happens; 4.5 grs with both 200 and 240 gr bullets. If they are a success, I'll load some 44-40 and after that, .45 Colt.
I find VanDenburg's bullet selection odd.: 250 gr. in .44 Russian (never a traditional weight), 250 in .44 Spl. (same), 250 in .44 mag. (same).
No comments on loading density compared to Trail Boss (up to the base of the bullet with no compression), just a comment that Tin Star is slower burning than Trail Boss.
He loaded both .38 Spl. and .357 with 5 grs, but used a small Rifle primer with the .357 as per Vihtavuori's recommendation. Huh? But with the .44 mag load, they do NOT recommend a Large Rifle primer. Both magnum cases are 1/10th" longer than the non-magnum cases, so what's the difference?
I hate unexplained stuff like that.