Lets not squabble symantics here Major Matt, OK. As I stated, it was copied/taken from a secondary source in its entirty. It was not editted for NCOWS presentation. Those are not my words and don't insinuate that they are. Nor do they represent NCOWS by-laws since they come from a secondary source. That is why the statement (Taken from a secondary source) was added, so that it would not be construed as an NCOWS statement. I found it and presented it here for clarification of a question. There is no legal/by-laws aspect to the offering of this information for defining what a Manhattan Mod would look like. I do not know why the individual had that last line in his statement, other than comparision to other forms of ignitions. That was not significant to the information being presented to Trap or French Jack...............