Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 10
1
Colt Firearms / Re: New old Colt
« Last post by Abilene on Today at 11:07:40 AM »
At this point, I attribute the misfires (I think there were two out of 30 rounds in the match) to an EXTREMELY hour-glassed mainspring.  ;)
2
Tall Tales / Re: May we move on, for coffee and chat ?
« Last post by Coffinmaker on Today at 11:06:44 AM »

I have to be in agreement.  Ifin it takes morin 20 minutes with a Vet to get back on its feet, it be overcooked fer sure.

looks like 65 here in the North.  May go to 72 or 3 in the afternoon.  We're also forecast for Thunderstorms.  Be time to hop out onna Veranda and watch the Lightning and enjoy the Ka-Boom.  Love Thunderstorms.
3
The Darksider's Den / Re: How did we get these "Calibers"?
« Last post by Abilene on Today at 11:02:46 AM »
:)  Well Heck  ;)

Just a tiny little point here.  Nearly as I can remember from my spotty research, Colt didn't convert the 1861 percussion guns to cartridge.  The Navy only had 1851 Navy guns, of which they (the Navy) did send a pile to Colt for conversion.

This was the basis for my only (other than no quality control) criticism of the late Armi San Marco "1860" Richards conversions.  Those guns were ALL based on the 1861 which Colt did not convert.  Although I still think the Armi San Marco conversions were the best looking "modern" conversions even if historically incorrect.

Colt converted both '51 and '61 percussion guns, but only as Richards-Masons.  Never converted either of them to Richards type 1 or type 2 (well, they made ONE type 2 '61 that is shown in McDowell's book, which is what I use as the basis for my type 2 '61  :) ).

The '61 R-M barrels were sleeker than the percussion barrels, had the bottom trimmed off.  No modern manufacturer has ever reproduced that one.
4
The Winchester Model 1873 / Re: Recreating the original .32WCF loading
« Last post by Major 2 on Today at 10:57:21 AM »
Of mine, only the 73 gets BP or APP and the Springfields Slim cast bullet on the left.

The Hi-Teks are on the right for the Smith & Wesson
5

I know you guys already know this, but Hi-Tec coatings do absolutely nothing for Black Powder shooters.  Shooting BP you gotta have enough BP compatible lube.  Hi-Tec is acceptable though, iff your shooting APP.
6
Colt Firearms / Re: New old Colt
« Last post by Coffinmaker on Today at 10:40:30 AM »

 :) Ah forgot  ;)

Abilene, since the cylinder isn't native to the gun, I'd also check the Head Space (fail to fire), although some of the fail to fire may be attributed to "operator error"  ::)
7
The Darksider's Den / Re: How did we get these "Calibers"?
« Last post by Coffinmaker on Today at 10:08:13 AM »

 :)  Well Heck  ;)

Just a tiny little point here.  Nearly as I can remember from my spotty research, Colt didn't convert the 1861 percussion guns to cartridge.  The Navy only had 1851 Navy guns, of which they (the Navy) did send a pile to Colt for conversion.

This was the basis for my only (other than no quality control) criticism of the late Armi San Marco "1860" Richards conversions.  Those guns were ALL based on the 1861 which Colt did not convert.  Although I still think the Armi San Marco conversions were the best looking "modern" conversions even if historically incorrect.
8
The Longbranch / Re: I Gave Up!
« Last post by Coffinmaker on Today at 09:59:03 AM »

 :) ABILENE !!  ;)

Oh for Pete's Sake.  Digital??  Griff??  Griff with Digital ??  Shirley you Jest.  Just ain't no way.  You know durn'd well Griff be a LUDDITE  ::) (I think??)
9
CAS City Classifieds / Re: WTB: Uberti Bisley stocks
« Last post by Crossdrawnj on Today at 09:15:08 AM »
Until you said wood grips, I was going to suggest http://www.gripmaker.com/ and https://gungrip.com  for faux ivory grips.  The latter is N C Ordnance, and they say theirs is for a Beretta Stampede Bisley which I've never even heard of but probably made by Uberti.

I saw them too in my search.  The Stampede is an early gun and probably has a two piece grip frame. All Bisley's coming out of Italy now by Uberti have a one piece grip frame.  Stocks for one will not fit the other, from what I have learned.
10
The Winchester Model 1873 / Re: Recreating the original .32WCF loading
« Last post by Major 2 on Today at 08:35:28 AM »
I'll try to give you more about the Missouri Bullet Co.s Hi-tech coated.

You can see the Red Hi Tech coated on the right in the photo above size to .313" dia.

Here is the Marlin
Dads Smith & Wesson Hand Ejector
and my Colt
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 10
SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk
© 1995 - 2023 CAScity.com