Author Topic: A sad fate for an Artillery model  (Read 455 times)

Offline Roscoe Coles

  • Top Active Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 365
  • SSS Spencer Shotgun Resident Expert
  • SASS #: 1188
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 1
A sad fate for an Artillery model
« on: October 08, 2021, 09:17:10 PM »
A buddy sent me this sad picture of a colt that came into his shop today.  It is a martially marked artillery model that someone decided to tart up.  Bad polishing, bad engraving, cheap poorly fitted plastic grips, and tarty plating have pretty much destroyed it’s value.  I am amazed that anyone would do this to a rare gun.  As you can see by the price, it turned a valuable gun into shooter. 

Offline St. George

  • Deputy Marshal
  • Top Active Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 4720
  • NCOWS , GAF, B.O.L.D., Order of St. George, SOCOM,
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: A sad fate for an Artillery model
« Reply #1 on: October 08, 2021, 10:34:45 PM »
When this was done, no one revered them - they weren't placed on silken pillows and covered with Renaissance Wax, to be handled with white gloves.

Hard to imagine, I know...

Back then - not even Kopec, Graham and Moore were writing about them - and they were likely the first to do so.

These were cheap - surplus guns always are - and many fit the bill to be cleaned up and embellished with zero thought to the collectors of the future.

Back then, they weren't Holy Relics - they were just low-cost, used revolvers.

Scouts Out!
"It Wasn't Cowboys and Ponies - It Was Horses and Men.
It Wasn't Schoolboys and Ladies - It Was Cowtowns and Sin..."

Offline Roscoe Coles

  • Top Active Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 365
  • SSS Spencer Shotgun Resident Expert
  • SASS #: 1188
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 1
Re: A sad fate for an Artillery model
« Reply #2 on: October 08, 2021, 11:46:14 PM »
Well, I don’t belong to the silk pillow crowd.  My RAC 1890 cavalry model (below) lives in a holster like all my SAAs, and gets shot with BP, whenever I get the chance.  The guy who sent me the pictures has an earlier cavalry model and an artillery (that he traded from me 30 years ago) that he shoots as well.  You should see the faces of folks at SASS shoots when they figure out they are not reproductions!

I have read the articles from the 50s in the Rifleman on how to slick up your SAA with Smith and Wesson sights and a vent rib. And the ones on how to rebuild you old Winchester 1885 target rifle into some wildcat cartridge. In my years in the used gun trade, as a smith, and as a collector I have seen quite a few nice guns that where ruined by “improvement” and every time I do I think the guy who had it done should get a swift kick in the jewels.  The gunsmith who did it should have them cut off.

Just my opinion, but I am not likely to change it. 

Offline Dave T

  • NCOWS Member
  • Top Active Citizen
  • ***
  • Posts: 793
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 383
Re: A sad fate for an Artillery model
« Reply #3 on: October 09, 2021, 01:01:55 PM »
That's not just a shame, it's a crying shame.

When I got into CAS back in the mid 1980s the reproductions weren't as nice as they are today.  Back then the Italians didn't quite have the knack of tempering screws and springs.  I started with a Uberti made 45 Colt but after replacing a number of springs and stripping screw slots I gave up on it. Then I came across an 1882 Colt that someone had installed with 2nd Gen barrel and cylinder.  About the same time I found an old gunsmith who liked old guns and knew how to fix them.

I spent the next 10-11 years finding junker Colts, Winchesters, and other 19th Century firearms and restoring them to shootable condition.  Shot nothing but full charges of black powder behind soft cast bullets back then and loved every minute of it.  Like the OP I got a lot of surprised comments when fellow shooters found out I was shooting originals.  The most common question was why I had to shoot such heavy loads.  LOL

Back in the those days I would have been tempted to buy that Artillery and then try to "fix" it.  Not sure that's even possible but it deserves the effort of someone  who cares about old guns and history.

My $.02 worth,
Dave

Offline River City John

  • NCOWS Senator
  • NCOWS Member
  • Top Active Citizen
  • ***
  • Posts: 4114
  • Mr. & Mrs. John Covert
  • NCOWS #: L-146
  • GAF #: 275
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 174
Re: A sad fate for an Artillery model
« Reply #4 on: October 09, 2021, 02:59:19 PM »
Perhaps as well lament the huge purchases of surplus Springfield rifle barrels and other ordnance used by Bannerman's to build a breakwater for his Hudson River island.

St. George pegged it. Different times and what was considered scrap, - now scarcity and the longings fed by nostalgia have rendered invaluable.

   
"I was born by the river in a little tent, and just like the river I've been running ever since." - Sam Cooke
"He who will not look backward with reverence, will not look forward with hope." - Edmund Burke
". . .freedom is not everything or the only thing, perhaps we will put that discovery behind us and comprehend, before it's too late, that without freedom all else is nothing."- G. Warren Nutter
NCOWS #L146
GAF #275

Advertisers

  • Guest
Re: A sad fate for an Artillery model
« Reply #5 on: Today at 01:44:27 PM »

Offline Roscoe Coles

  • Top Active Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 365
  • SSS Spencer Shotgun Resident Expert
  • SASS #: 1188
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 1
Re: A sad fate for an Artillery model
« Reply #5 on: October 09, 2021, 03:23:34 PM »
Dave, I started shooting SASS in the mid 80s as well (SASS 1188) and shot original Colt Bisleys (still do).  The Italian guns can be fine, heck they use better steel than Colt did back in the day.  They just need tuning up.  Still, there is nothing like a Colt.  I too restore guns (the gun shown below was a gray 2nd gen that
 was missing half the trigger guard when I got it). I looked hard at this gun to see if it was worth the effort.  It could be done, assuming you could get the plating off, but the math is not right.  It would need a new proper cylinder and maybe a new barrel.  There might be some welding to build up rounded edges as well.  Lots of work. 

As for different times, and Bannerman, that was done a long time ago when they had no value.  It’s a shame, but no one at that time new the value of a surplus gun better than Bannerman.  If he couldn’t sell it, it couldn’t be sold.  The work on this gun is much more recent and less forgivable. But worst of all, it’s really bad work. 

Offline Roscoe Coles

  • Top Active Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 365
  • SSS Spencer Shotgun Resident Expert
  • SASS #: 1188
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 1
Re: A sad fate for an Artillery model
« Reply #6 on: October 09, 2021, 10:37:12 PM »
My buddy decided to buy it for one of his three daughters. The other two already have 1880s Colts, so this makes a set.  It was built in 1883 and was probably a nice gun before it was messed with. 

Offline Roscoe Coles

  • Top Active Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 365
  • SSS Spencer Shotgun Resident Expert
  • SASS #: 1188
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 1
Re: A sad fate for an Artillery model
« Reply #7 on: October 13, 2021, 10:50:48 PM »
Well, it gets more interesting.  The gun is listed by serial number in the Springfield research books as having been issued to Company L of the 7th cavalry on March 14, 1888.  Manufactured in 1883, it is obviously post Little Bighorn, but knowing the history makes it a better deal and a good candidate for restoration.  I talked to my buddy and am going to try and work out a deal to get it.  Then I need to talk with Dave Lanara. 

Offline Dave T

  • NCOWS Member
  • Top Active Citizen
  • ***
  • Posts: 793
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 383
Re: A sad fate for an Artillery model
« Reply #8 on: October 14, 2021, 12:44:59 PM »
I'm guessing the serial number you are referring to is on the frame.  If you get it and it really is an Artillery Colt instead of just a cut down Cavalry gun, research the serial numbers of all the various parts and pieces.  Thirty years ago I had an Artillery Model and its parts dated from 1874 to 1892.  Literally a history of the Colt Single Action Army in government service.

Dave

Offline Roscoe Coles

  • Top Active Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 365
  • SSS Spencer Shotgun Resident Expert
  • SASS #: 1188
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 1
Re: A sad fate for an Artillery model
« Reply #9 on: October 14, 2021, 09:44:23 PM »
 The frame is 1883 and that is the number that’s 7th cavalry.  The trigger guard is 1885, and the cylinder is post 1900 (according to Dave Lanara).  It’s likely that the gun was at the battle of Wounded Knee, which in interesting.  I bought it today and can’t wait to see it so I can work out all the details.  The detail photos I got today show that it is not as polished as I though from the first picture. 

Advertisers

  • Guest
Re: A sad fate for an Artillery model
« Reply #10 on: Today at 01:44:27 PM »

Offline Dave T

  • NCOWS Member
  • Top Active Citizen
  • ***
  • Posts: 793
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 383
Re: A sad fate for an Artillery model
« Reply #10 on: Yesterday at 09:49:20 AM »
Please revisit this thread after Dave Lanara has his way with it.  I look forward to the restored result.

Best of luck with this project,
Dave

Offline Roscoe Coles

  • Top Active Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 365
  • SSS Spencer Shotgun Resident Expert
  • SASS #: 1188
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 1
Re: A sad fate for an Artillery model
« Reply #11 on: Today at 10:37:34 AM »
 It may not be a good candidate for a full restoration.  We will see when it gets here. The first step would be to remove the plating, which can be a challenge, especially with gold.  In any case, Dave is 2 years behind on restorations so the “after” shots are a ways off if it goes to restoration. 

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk

© 1995 - 2021 CAScity.com