Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 10
1
At one point some of Santee's videos just showed up as a link, he didn't know why, then they started back to normal.  Gremlins.  :)

Yeah, who knows?  ;D
2
At one point some of Santee's videos just showed up as a link, he didn't know why, then they started back to normal.  Gremlins.  :)
3
NCOWS / Re: 2024 Jerry Barnes Match
« Last post by Tascosa Joe on Today at 10:00:48 AM »
That is one way to get him in a bath tub.
4
Not sure why it showed up as link instead of being imbedded.
6
The Leather Shop / Re: SHOW US YER STUFF Thread #5
« Last post by Rube Burrows on Today at 09:30:09 AM »
Excellent work  Ruby, good stamping choice and well done all around, this holster a classy look to it..
Thanks for sharing
tEEn wOLVES  ;D

Thanks. Appreciate the kind words.
7
NCOWS / 2024 Jerry Barnes Match
« Last post by Books OToole on Today at 09:15:47 AM »
I think the match was a success.  Weather was hit and miss but there was as much laughter as there was shooting.

Here's a glimpse: Wooly Dan Carder.

Books

(Post more pictures if you have any.)
8
The Darksider's Den / Re: How did we get these "Calibers"?
« Last post by Coffinmaker on Today at 08:10:48 AM »

Well Hot Diggity!!  All this time I have been of the impression, Colt didn't convert the 1861s to suppositories.  I will say I have never seen one in captivity nor in the wild.  I also rate the Armi San Marco Richards as some of the best looking and shooting conversions built by any modern Mfg. even if 75% of them were mechanically KRAP.

Coffinmaker
9
The Leather Shop / Man With No Name
« Last post by Grenadier on Today at 07:23:41 AM »
Anyone have a pattern for this holster? I lucked out and picked up the revolver this past weekend and would love to make the correct holster and belt.
10
The Darksider's Den / Re: How did we get these "Calibers"?
« Last post by Mako on Today at 01:55:35 AM »
Mako, that's an Army grip, right?  Did it come that way?

Yes it did, which is why I bought it.  I have big hands and prefer the Army grip.  I have never seen an original  '51 or '61 with the Army grip but you could order the '60 with the Navy grip from Colt's back in the day.   pbbbbbbb, little girl handed West Point graduates.  I have seen pictures of originals with Navy grips and they had brass trigger guards with brass back straps.  The brass back straps jump out at you when you see a color picture or in a collection.

I have '51s (Leech & Rigdons) and '61s which I can easily shoot with the smaller grips because they are mousegun caliber.  Basically the power factor of a .380 ACP.  The '60 army shooting balls is actually equivalent to a .38 spl. (140gr ball at less than 950 fps by my chronograph...)

I actually like the size of the later Dragoon Grips, I want my pinky on the grip and not underneath it.  I made the mistake of getting one pair of '71-'72 open tops in .38 Spl with the Navy Grips and another pair in .44 with the Army grips.  I wanted an "early model" and a "Late model" I wish they were all Army grips. 

Know anyone who wants to trade a pair of .44 spl (or .44 Colt) with Army grips for a pair of consecutive serial number 7 1/2" barrel .38 spl revolvers with Navy grips?  I don't care if they are Conversion Models or '71-'72s (barrel length doesn't matter). The .38s are very clean and shot very little.

~Mako
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 10
SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk
© 1995 - 2023 CAScity.com