Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 10
1
Upcoming Musters / Re: Dept. of the Missouri Muster
« Last post by ira scott on Today at 02:49:54 PM »
Al, I like your weather forecast better than the professional's, I sure hope they're wrong!

B.N. Scotty
2
Spencer Shooting Society / Re: Chiappa Spencer quality control
« Last post by Treeman on Today at 02:15:02 PM »
Three months ago I was in a large local gun shop. I asked if they had a Chiappa spencer. He pointed to one hanging on the wall behind the counter. I’d missed it. He said it was new but had been hanging there for like 6 years. He said they’d sold a few and had them come back for repairs so they’d not put this one out to sell. It had been relegated to a wall hanging decoration. It still had the 2018 price of $1800. I told him to give me a deal and I’d buy it and never bring it back for repairs if there were issues. He gave me a handful of snap caps to try there in the store. They would not recycle reliably. That was good for me because he sold me the rifle for $1200 or so. I brought it home, read a lot here and loaded up a bunch of ammo. I used 255 grain hard cast Keith bullets from Missouri bullet co in my loads. Got them loaded at exactly 1.6 inches and started shooting. Trigger measured at 6lbs right out of the box. The first 100 rounds I had quite a few feed issues. I just kept shooting and learning how to manhandle the lever. Now that I have about 500 rounds through it it’s as smooth as glass. Took at least 150 rounds to get it to this point. The only issue I had was feeding the very last round from the magazine. I clipped a couple rings off the spring and that cured that issue.
3
STORM / Re: How accurate?
« Last post by Coffinmaker on Today at 08:43:59 AM »

 :) RoyceP  ;)

Yep.  Open Tops be a mite fickle.  Understand, they will shoot well with almost anything you feed 'em.  However, if you're after little itty bitty groups, you'll have to play around with load/bullet combinations to find what the gun likes best.

I have a much more simplistic approach these days.  I simply load APP 3f to the bullet base.  Any bullet.  Although my preference for a .38 runs to the 125Gr Truncated Cone.  Very Accurate.  For the .44 I like a 160Gr RNFP, also quite accurate.  The .45 gets Tricky.  I really like Cowboy 45 Special cases with 130Gr Barnstormer bullets in .45 Colt chambers.  In my conversions, I am running 45 ACP cylinders, with 45 ACP cases (natch) and Barnstormer bullets.  Both of which are very accurate.  They shoot better than I do.
4
STORM / Re: How accurate?
« Last post by RoyceP on Yesterday at 07:55:41 PM »
So my take on the Uberti (Cimarron) reproduction is that you will have to experiment with ammo to see what yours likes. Mine is a 44 caliber, it was listed on the box as 44 Special, Colt and Russian. Mine is very accurate shooting 44 Russian with 200 grain bullets over a mid - range load of Unique powder. It was super low with 44 Special factory ammo, like 5" below POA.
5
Shotguns / Re: Simson Suhl sxs sold by geco
« Last post by Tornado on Yesterday at 07:46:43 PM »
On the other hand if you leave the 30" and miss for some freak reason, you could just push the knock-down targets over with the barrels.  ;D
Cool shotgun!
6
Shotguns / Re: need source for Chinese '87
« Last post by Macon Due on Yesterday at 04:58:44 PM »
Abilene
No Sir, 32850 Avionics on C-130s.
Macon
7
STORM / Re: How accurate?
« Last post by Mako on Yesterday at 02:21:59 PM »
Willy,
To your original post, the accuracy other than for a fighting pistol can be all over the place with the barrels held on as they are and with the way that CoffinMaker(one wurd) pointed out that Uberti insists on making the Arbor lengths (and sometimes bore to arbor fits).

I have seen individuals use feeler gauges to set the gap between the barrel and cylinder each time they reassemble the revolver trying to keep the barrel parallel to the arbor.  They press the wedge in with their thumbs while having the shim in between.  The problem is that it won't stay unless you press the wedge in a bit more and then while shooting it tends to loosen up. 

I've seen a wedge drop out (unbeknownst to the shooter) and the barrel get pushed forward upon firing.  Fortunately no harm done to man or the beastie he was shooting.  He thought the gun had exploded, but the barrel actually stayed on the arbor, it was sitt'n catawampus)  That is a technical descriptive geometry term used by the finer carpenters of coffins and other such fine furniture.

And, CoffinMaker(one wurd) is right about the malady is not confined to Uberti cap and ball revolvers.  I have some 71/72 Open Tops and a couple of Richards Type II conversions and they also had short Arbors.  I only have one Uberti (an 1861 Model) that actually had an Arbor that was almost correct.  Probably .002" short, I left it alone.

As an aside, I had one 1860 that shot about 5 inches high at 15 yards, it needed a .100" taller sight. But that is how Colt's originally produced them to U.S. Army requirements.  I find it interesting the Army abandoned that philosophy upon accepting the '73 SAA, those don't seem to shoot a foot high at 50 yards.
 
You can stabilize and align the barrel with a spacer (There are lock washers {"spring washer"} you can use as spacers) in the arbor hole; or a built up arbor using a set screw, insert on the tip (exempli gratia the instructions from Pettifogger) or welding material on the end of the arbor.  That works well and I think I can almost guarantee you will get a 4" capable pistola at 25 yrds.

I believe all of Mine will do 4 inches at 25 yds if I do my part.  But, I want mine sighted in for 15 yards.  Them's pistol fight'n distances, otherwise turn and run away...

~Mako
8
STORM / Re: How accurate?
« Last post by Mako on Yesterday at 01:36:35 PM »

Quote from: Galloway on Yesterday at 08:18:01 PM

 I have two without arbor modifications that will do under 4'' at 25 yards, but the poi is roughly 3'' high at 12yards, 6'' high at 25yards, and 12-15'' high at 50yards good luck


I could remedy that …thanks for the reply

Yep, Galloway needs a front sight that is .07" to .073" taller if he is talking about 1860s with 8 inch barrels and the rear sight on the hammer.  Harder to do with a blade than the round front sight on the Navy models and the Remingtons.

Typical Army thinking, have a revolver made that has the sights set for 75 or 100yds instead of the distances they would be used at.

~Mako
9
STORM / Re: How accurate?
« Last post by willy on Yesterday at 11:47:19 AM »
I have two without arbor modifications that will do under 4'' at 25 yards, but the poi is roughly 3'' high at 12yards, 6'' high at 25yards, and 12-15'' high at 50yards good luck
I could remedy that …thanks for the reply
10
STORM / Re: How accurate?
« Last post by willy on Yesterday at 11:45:58 AM »
:) Willy  ;)

Attz gonna depend (no not the ones inna plastic package).  I have own'd and set-up a lot of Open Tops.  Two inch groups are not unreasonable.  However, the first thing you would have to do is take the "slop" out of the guns.  They have abysmal Barrel to Arbor fit and that has to be addressed so guns go together solidly.  This applies to ALL of Uberti's Open Top designed guns.  Whether they be Percussion or Cartridge, that Barrel to Arbor fit must be fix'd.  Then your dow to finding the right bullet/load combination the gun likes.  It is the Way.

I am  familiar with the arbor fit on the Uberti revolvers.
I addressed the problem on all my cap and ball Uberti revolvers.
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 10
SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk
© 1995 - 2023 CAScity.com