Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 10
1
SCORRS / Sixgun Spotlight - A New Series On My Channel
« Last post by Rube Burrows on Today at 10:41:04 AM »
Decided to do a new series on my channel called Sixgun Spotlight.
Figured I would do the Remington 1875 in the first installment.

2
I've never used the saddle ring on the different carbines, and I've never seen them used on actual carrying vis-a-viz riding and hunting- not to say other folks don't have different experience.  I always dismounted if I was going to take a rifle shot, so the shorter barrels could be a little handier drawing out of the scabbard, but the best luck I had was with either my old 1894 (26" barrel) or my model 71 with the 24" barrel.  I've taken one or two shots with a pistol off a horse, but the ensuing rodeo is not worth the fuss.  Now, my experience may be far different from most folks that have a lot more experience than I do ;)
3
Shotguns / Re: Anyone have any problems with Brass shells in 87 ?
« Last post by Cap'n Redneck on Today at 05:46:11 AM »
The MagTech 2-7/16" shells should duplicate the 2,5" shells that the 1887 was constructed for pretty closely.
Back in the day the 2,5" all-brass shells would have been roll crimped too.

I have an early-production Norinco 1887 chambered in 12/70.  I use un-cut, un-crimped MagTech all-brass shells, but do not load them from the magazine; I put one in the chamber and one down on the cartridge lift.  I have done some smoothing of rough edges inside the receiver / chamber area, and this set-up has served me well for years in CAS-mainmatch.

I will have to do some more experimenting with paper or plastic shells in order to make it feed six shells from the magazine for Wild Bunch.
4
Upcoming Musters / Re: Dept. of the Missouri Muster
« Last post by Sam Perfye on Today at 05:31:33 AM »
Slim, we'll be shooting at either AR500 steel or paper. Anything short of AP will be o.k.
5
Shotguns / Re: Anyone have any problems with Brass shells in 87 ?
« Last post by Macon Due on Today at 12:12:59 AM »
Abilene,yes Sir they are Magtech, 2 7/16" long whereas the paper shells ,roll crimped and ready to fire are 2 1/4" in length.
Macon
6
Shotguns / Re: Anyone have any problems with Brass shells in 87 ?
« Last post by Abilene on Yesterday at 11:20:25 PM »
I don't own an '87 but you might mention how long are the shells?  Are they Magtechs? 
7
Upcoming Musters / Re: Dept. of the Missouri Muster
« Last post by Silver Creek Slim on Yesterday at 09:46:57 PM »
What ammo do we need for the long range rifle?

Slim
8
Upcoming Musters / Re: Dept. of the Missouri Muster
« Last post by Silver Creek Slim on Yesterday at 09:45:05 PM »
Here's hoping someone will record the "goings on" for posterity and those attending vicariously.
Looking forward to the photo's :)
I'll see what I can do.

Slim
9
Shotguns / Re: My 1897's
« Last post by Baltimore Ed on Yesterday at 09:09:13 PM »
Shoot WB simultaneously with your monthly matches a couple times a year. Everyone shoots the same targets only WB shooters shoot twice as much. And have twice the fun. ‘’Give’em hell ,Pike!’’
‘’More fun than a hog killen.’’
10
Shotguns / Anyone have any problems with Brass shells in 87 ?
« Last post by Macon Due on Yesterday at 08:21:15 PM »
Howdy Gents
Today I got to make a very short test with my new Cimarron 1887 Lever gun. I tried roll crimped paper shells first. I had 2 or 3 that I had 'jiggle' the lever a bit to make em chamber. I think I need just a tiny bit more taper/roll crimp on them. Otherwise it was slick and fun. Then I tried the 12ga. brass shells and it would not feed at all. They were too long. They are longer by quite a bit over the roll crimped paper shells. So I guess I will shorten 10 of them [ to start] to the same length as the paper shells are loaded and roll crimped and see if that solves the problem. Have any of you had this problem with the brass 12 ga. shells in the 87's?
Thanks.......Macon
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 10
SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk
© 1995 - 2023 CAScity.com