Author Topic: Taylor's Pedersoli 1886  (Read 1034 times)

Offline 6MT

  • Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 21
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 24
Taylor's Pedersoli 1886
« on: February 01, 2023, 10:23:45 AM »
I just got one of my dream rifles. This one is a modern clone of the classic Winchester model 1886 lever in 45-70. I have been on a wait list for the Miroku Winchester 1886 for over two years. When I found out that there is no production date in the foreseeable future from Winchester, I decided to take the plunge on a Taylor’s & Company (read:hotrodded) Pedersoli 1886.



Thanks to a buddy of mine at a local gun store….he had two of these! So I proceeded to head out to see him for their gun show a week or so ago with the plan to choose one of the two that he had.

When I got it home, I cleaned it up, lubed, and treated the wood. It has the color case hardened finish. Words just can’t do this justice. Neither can my pictures…you really need to see this in person. The wood is incredible too, with a bit of tiger stripe on the butt.







This has the 26” round 1:18” barrel. The magazine holds 8 of the big torpedo rounds. And you can chamber one as well to give you 9 rounds on board.



So I immediately went about rolling up some rounds to try it out. I thought that using the same load as my old Marlin 1895 bear bust’n shorty would suffice. With 350gr flat nose full copper plated bullets over 49gr of IMR4198 with CCI BR2 primers. (I may try some black powder heavy cast loads in the future with this, I haven't yet decided.)









So out I went on Thursday (yes, I took the day off work) to try it out.

My first impressions were pretty good. The first ten shots were point of aim at 109 yards. The buckhorn style sights are dead-on! Banging away on all the steel, especially the small 8” gong, was sure fun! The loading gate is nothing like my Rossi .44mag. The Pedersoli is smooth like butter! Loading is a pleasure with this.





I decided to move over and try it out at longer range. I was popp’n away at 219 yards with regularity. Sad but true, but this might just be more accurate then my single shot Sharps 1874. But then again, it’s probably me and getting used to the sights on the Sharps. But this 1886 is a whole lot of fun! Yes it’s heavy. What do you expect with that action, the heavy wood, and that 26” barrel? (That weight helps quite a bit with recoil.) But once you get the hang of it…you can’t have more fun with your clothes on.

I shot a 103 rounds from the 1886 and, another 50 from my single shot Sharps. That’s a whole lot of 45-70 in one outing. And my shoulder was pretty sore on Friday. I am so glad I took the plunge on this. But I had to hide it from my Wife (successfully, I might add). And I really had other things financially that I needed to look after, but I don’t regret it.

Offline Buckaroo Lou

  • Top Active Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 523
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 93
Re: Taylor's Pedersoli 1886
« Reply #1 on: February 01, 2023, 11:22:38 AM »
That is a terrific looking rifle, and a very good write up about your first experience with it. I hope you have many years of more shooting pleasure. I love those big bore 1886 rifles. Actually, I love just about any lever action rifle.  ;D
A man's true measure is found not in what he says but in what he does.

Offline Abilene

  • CAS-L Ghost Rider
  • Top Active Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 4672
    • Abilene's CAS Pages
  • SASS #: 27489
  • NCOWS #: 3958
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 1180
Re: Taylor's Pedersoli 1886
« Reply #2 on: February 01, 2023, 01:05:14 PM »
I'm not familiar with the Miroku '86 but am going to guess it has some "safety" features on it.  I'd prefer the Pedersoli for that reason, as well as the fact that everything they make is usually excellent.  The Chiappa is nice as well, no safety, but the Pedersoli barrel is likely the best.

Advertising

  • Guest
Re: Taylor's Pedersoli 1886
« Reply #3 on: Today at 08:10:24 AM »

Offline Coal Creek Griff

  • Top Active Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 2078
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 634
Re: Taylor's Pedersoli 1886
« Reply #3 on: February 01, 2023, 01:58:20 PM »
Excellent write-up (with PICTURES)!  Congratulations!

I bought a Miroku 1886 in 2005 and it's a great rifle, but Abilene is correct: it has a rebounding hammer and tang safety (not to mention a coil mainspring).  The hammer and safety bother my sense of aesthetics as well as making it harder to mount a tang sight.  You made a very good choice.

If you're like me, when you feel the sore shoulder, you smile because you know how you got it.  I like that kind of soreness...

Griff
Manager, WT Ranch--Coal Creek Division

BOLD #921
BOSS #196
1860 Henry Rifle Shooter #173
SSS #573

Offline greyhawk

  • Top Active Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 1070
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 49
Re: Taylor's Pedersoli 1886
« Reply #4 on: February 02, 2023, 06:12:37 AM »
I got a Chiappa 1886 a couple years ago - the CCH finish not as showy as the Pedersoli but I like it better - good dark, heavy wood. Took some work to get it running but a  good solid piece - particularly like that they copied original specs  including no lawyer nonsense . 

Offline Roosterman

  • Top Active Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 569
    • Muzzleloading guns
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 96
Re: Taylor's Pedersoli 1886
« Reply #5 on: February 03, 2023, 11:06:38 AM »
I bought a pedersoli 71/86 "light" in 45-70. Has a rubber buttpad already on it I think it has a light 24" barrel. Anyway, it's a fine shooter, but even with 300gr bullets and BP it tends to beat me up some. I wish I would have bought a heavier gun. This one will make an excellent hunting gun though, but plinking isn't so great!
 The action functions great too.
www.fowlingguns.com
Known to run with scissors from time to time
Citadel of Sin Social Club

Offline Buckaroo Lou

  • Top Active Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 523
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 93
Re: Taylor's Pedersoli 1886
« Reply #6 on: February 03, 2023, 02:18:15 PM »
I have both a rifle and a saddle ring carbine. My rifle is a new Winchester Deluxe Sporting Rifle with a 24” barrel and my carbine is a Browning with a 22” barrel. I have not had any problems shooting either rifle, but I stay away from heavy bullets and heavy loads. I have never used either rifle hunting in bear country so I just haven’t needed a heavy load. I shoot either a 300gr or 325gr RNFP GC bullet over 33gr. of IMR 4198 with a very small piece of poly pillow filler as a filler. I have never shot black powder from my lever rifles. I shoot BP only in my Sharps and rolling block rifles and heavier bullets and they recoil harder than my lever rifles, and they are several pounds heavier.

I did recently purchase the new Ruger made Marlin SBL and Trapper and they are the lightest 45-70’s I own. They are neither one the traditional cowboy style rifle. Thankfully, they both have very good factory recoil pads and thus far I have found they are a hoot to shoot and don’t beat me up at all. Again, understand I shoot the same rounds in them as my other 1886 rifles. I leave all those dinosaur rounds for the younger guys. 😊 
A man's true measure is found not in what he says but in what he does.

Offline greyhawk

  • Top Active Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 1070
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 49
Re: Taylor's Pedersoli 1886
« Reply #7 on: March 28, 2023, 08:11:26 AM »
I'm not familiar with the Miroku '86 but am going to guess it has some "safety" features on it.  I'd prefer the Pedersoli for that reason, as well as the fact that everything they make is usually excellent.  The Chiappa is nice as well, no safety, but the Pedersoli barrel is likely the best.

I have a Chiappa --if the Pedersoli barrel is better ...its a hair split - the difference is somewhere beyond my shooting ability

you are proly right     I have a Uberti 76 that has Pedersoli barrel (rumour says) --- its a tad more shiny inside - maybe fouls a little slower with blackpowder ? but my first outing with a tang sight on the Chiappa I was seriously impressed. 

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk

© 1995 - 2023 CAScity.com