Author Topic: R&D verses Kirst  (Read 5714 times)

Offline Andrew Quigley

  • Very Active Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 90
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
R&D verses Kirst
« on: June 20, 2006, 03:16:19 PM »
Well this might be a can of worms but thought I'd ask around. The Kirst is 289 and the R&D is 225. Add the price for either them doing the work or you doing it and buying the tools and renting the jig and R&D's is about them same price.
 Course ya still got to do the loading slot for the Kirst ya self for that price. Would ya rather drill holes in ya frame or a little rattling from the Kirst as I heard they do?
Buy American as the job you save might be your own!


Andrew Quigley

Offline warbucks16

  • Top Active Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 154
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: R&D verses Kirst
« Reply #1 on: June 20, 2006, 03:37:34 PM »
Being an owner and user of both Kirst & R&D, I feel that the Kirst is the better choice. If you are a do it yourselfer it is a much easier installation. In addition the tolerances are more forgving when installing and using.

My arsenal includes 3, 1851 Navies in 38 Long Colt, 1, 1858 army Remy in 45 Long Colt and 1, Ruger Old Army in 45 Long Colt.

An example of the tolerance is on my R&D 38 Long Colt if the crimp is a little to heavy they will not fit into the cylinder, on the other hand the Kirst again is more forgiving and slips right in. On my  45 Long Colt the R&D will not accept the 45 Long Colt and the 45 schofield without modification, the Kirst will accept both without a modification.

Accuracy seems to be about the same and is dictated by the quality of your revolver and your expertise at using it.

As far as quality goes they are both extremely well made but for overall use and convenience the Kirst Gets my vote.

Hope this helps.

E-Mail me or post again if you would like more specifics.

Warbucks16
SASS Member
Storm Member #201
Scorrs Member
Retired Navy Senior Chief Hospital Corpsman
Marine Recon and Jump Qualified
Vietnam Viet 70-71 and proud of it!
Member NRA
45 Cowboy Special User.

Offline Montana Slim

  • NCOWS Member
  • Top Active Citizen
  • ***
  • Posts: 1940
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 101
Re: R&D verses Kirst
« Reply #2 on: June 20, 2006, 03:53:53 PM »
I've worked with both Kirst and R&D. On the Colt-type, per this forum, I prefer the R&D gated conversion to the Kirst, 'course I may be prejudiced. The gate operates easier due to it's construction. Also the firing pin retention is better. Kirst is easy to remove for cleaning & easier to install.

Slim
Western Reenacting                 Dark Lord of Soot
Live Action Shooting                 Pistoleer Extrordinaire
Firearms Consultant                  Gun Cleaning Specialist
NCOWS Life Member                 NRA Life Member

Advertising

  • Guest
Re: R&D verses Kirst
« Reply #3 on: Today at 12:58:37 AM »

Offline Andrew Quigley

  • Very Active Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 90
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: R&D verses Kirst
« Reply #3 on: June 21, 2006, 06:58:20 AM »
Dang! looks like it might come down to a coin toss! Thanks for the info. I don't mind doing the work myself but I have some many projects going I hate to start another one. Course R&D said turn around time is 30 to 90 days.
 I don't shoot this pistol much right now and really want it for a shoot coming up in October so I have time I just need to get er done I reckon!
Buy American as the job you save might be your own!


Andrew Quigley

Offline warbucks16

  • Top Active Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 154
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: R&D verses Kirst
« Reply #4 on: June 21, 2006, 10:11:11 AM »
Please take R&D's time estimate with some skepticism. I sent them two barrels to be lined and ejector installed on one,  they also gave me a 90 days estimate. After waiting 6 months, the one for lining was finally returned to me. It had been lined but what began as a new barrel came back with many scuffs and abarsions that never did polish out, and the bore full of grease and metal shavings. After a year of promising me the other barrel "NEXT WEEK", I requested that it be returned to me as is. It again came back to me with many scuffs.

From what I was told by their personnel , Kenny Howell does all the gunsmithing and although
 he is an excellent gunsmith it appears he is overwhelmed with work.

Hope you have better luck.

Warbucks16
SASS Member
Storm Member #201
Scorrs Member
Retired Navy Senior Chief Hospital Corpsman
Marine Recon and Jump Qualified
Vietnam Viet 70-71 and proud of it!
Member NRA
45 Cowboy Special User.

Offline Andrew Quigley

  • Very Active Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 90
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: R&D verses Kirst
« Reply #5 on: June 21, 2006, 12:17:27 PM »
Thanks for that insight. Never heard that before.
Buy American as the job you save might be your own!


Andrew Quigley

Offline The Wizard

  • Active citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 33
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: R&D verses Kirst
« Reply #6 on: July 27, 2006, 08:32:54 AM »
Just to expand on warbucks16's comment I just got back two cylinders I sent to R&D to have the naval battle scenes put on and blued.  Before I sent them out on 12 April 2006, I had been told "This work would usually take two weeks for return to you.".  It was 15 weeks before I got them back.  The quality of the work is acceptable. 

Offline Jrw8214

  • Top Active Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 130
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: R&D verses Kirst
« Reply #7 on: July 28, 2006, 01:05:09 AM »
i noticed they no longer have ejector assemblies on their website, does anyone know whey they stopped providing those?

Offline warbucks16

  • Top Active Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 154
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: R&D verses Kirst
« Reply #8 on: July 28, 2006, 12:38:23 PM »
Jrw8214:

In answer to your question, the last time I spoke to their Customer Service I was told that Kenny Howell does all the gunsmithing and he no longer had time.

I had called about installing an ejector and pluging the rammer hole on my Pietta 1851 Navy which they also used to do.

Apparently he is just overwhelmed with work so they took it off the web site, however he will still custom build you a revolver if you are willing to wait a year or two.

Hope this helps.

If you want an ejector Kirst currently has one for the 1851 Navy and will soon have one for the 1861 Navy.

I put one on several of my Kirst conversions and they work well and look good.

Warbucks16
SASS Member
Storm Member #201
Scorrs Member
Retired Navy Senior Chief Hospital Corpsman
Marine Recon and Jump Qualified
Vietnam Viet 70-71 and proud of it!
Member NRA
45 Cowboy Special User.

Offline Jrw8214

  • Top Active Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 130
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: R&D verses Kirst
« Reply #9 on: July 28, 2006, 02:22:00 PM »
do you know how much kirst will charge to completely convert a pietta?

Offline warbucks16

  • Top Active Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 154
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: R&D verses Kirst
« Reply #10 on: July 28, 2006, 03:55:23 PM »
Kirst does not do the conversions themselves. They have a Company called Ravens Roost due them. you can E-mail them for information at: http://www.kirstkonverter.com

After going into the site, click on: To Purchase and then click on Ravens Roost.

If you are talking about the ejector only it is a bolt on do it yourself kit. Easy to put on and works well.

If you want to look at it they are sold by River Junction Trade Co., Their site address is:  www.riverjunction.com

E-mail me if I can be of further help.

Regards,

Warbucks16
SASS Member
Storm Member #201
Scorrs Member
Retired Navy Senior Chief Hospital Corpsman
Marine Recon and Jump Qualified
Vietnam Viet 70-71 and proud of it!
Member NRA
45 Cowboy Special User.

Offline Jrw8214

  • Top Active Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 130
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: R&D verses Kirst
« Reply #11 on: July 28, 2006, 06:13:20 PM »
I just emailed them. Thanks

Offline Jrw8214

  • Top Active Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 130
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: R&D verses Kirst
« Reply #12 on: August 02, 2006, 01:57:58 PM »
i havent heard back from them yet.

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk

© 1995 - 2023 CAScity.com