Poll

Do you think we should restructure our shooting classes?

Yes
No
Do Not Care

Author Topic: To restructure or not to restructure - that IS the question  (Read 66992 times)

Offline Cole Bluesteele

  • NCOWS Member
  • Top Active Citizen
  • ***
  • Posts: 978
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: To restructure or not to restructure - that IS the question
« Reply #60 on: December 12, 2011, 12:42:51 PM »
Major,

Granted Greenhorn would not be a regional or national level class.

Ted

Offline Cliff Fendley

  • NCOWS Member
  • Top Active Citizen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3700
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 363
Re: To restructure or not to restructure - that IS the question
« Reply #61 on: December 12, 2011, 01:03:52 PM »
I also agree a greenhorn is not likely to show up to shoot at the Nationals so why does NCOWS as a whole have to make an entry level class mandatory?

Local posses can offer that if they feel it will bring in new shooters. It may not be the same for all, some parts of the country people are more likely to own different guns. Let the local posses structure any additional "entry level class" to suit their needs.

Working Cowboy is already entry level as far as I'm concerned. I used to truck pull so believe me this is a cheap sport. Maybe a sodbuster class would be fine for some posse but there hasn't been any interest when it was brought up at our meetings.
http://www.fendleyknives.com/

NCOWS 3345  RATS 576 NRA Life member

Johnson County Rangers

1961MJS

  • Guest
Re: To restructure or not to restructure - that IS the question
« Reply #62 on: December 12, 2011, 01:08:40 PM »
Hi

In my uneducated opinion, sobbuster would be a good class to have even if as something beyond an entry class.  A shotgun and a six-gun would be a decent cowboy combination from the three or four books on the subject I've read.  In many ways, a shotgun would be an easier gun to borrow in a lot of respects too.  12 gauge trap loads are pretty inexpensive and would be competitive with the other rounds that NCOWS would usually shoot.  I know that borrowing a Remington 870 is not as big a deal as borrowing a Browning over and under.  I haven't had a side by side in my hands for a while, are they idiot proof enough for the average newbie?

Later

Mike
Wichita KS

Advertising

  • Guest
Re: To restructure or not to restructure - that IS the question
« Reply #63 on: Today at 03:58:48 AM »

Offline St. George

  • Deputy Marshal
  • Top Active Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 4828
  • NCOWS , GAF, B.O.L.D., Order of St. George, SOCOM,
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: To restructure or not to restructure - that IS the question
« Reply #63 on: December 12, 2011, 02:11:39 PM »
There really doesn't need to be an entry-level class - not when 'Working Cowboy' uses the most basic of weaponry and such.

Weapons and leather-wise, it's the most affordable - and with little work, pretty much anyone who wants to put in the effort can look appropriate to the era.

Anything beyond that is dependant upon the individual's personal interest, and we can always offer guidance in how to find and modify clothing to fit the Impression.

As to pulling in young shooters - probably won't happen, unless they're already historically-minded.

The folks who actively shoot C&WAS are those who remember the romance of the TV Westerns and the oaters of the '50's and '60's - and those really don't have hollywood's support - though folks do say they like them.

I suspect more are viewed via 'Netflix' than on the Silver Screen.

Kids today dream differently and Gene and Roy aren't even close to their screen.

Posse-level shoots can do what they like - National-level shoots are (and should be) different - there should be an expected standard that isn't as important locally.

To reiterate:

If we're not careful, we'll be known as:

 'NCOWS - A Class Outfit, Where Everyone Has Their Own Class'...

So long as we continue to play to our strength of greater fidelity towards the 'real' Old West, and not the 'reel' or 'IPSC With Hats', or the 'SASS-Lite' versions, we'll attract like-minded folks, and those will fill our ranks.

Ride for the Brand!

Vaya,

Scouts Out!









"It Wasn't Cowboys and Ponies - It Was Horses and Men.
It Wasn't Schoolboys and Ladies - It Was Cowtowns and Sin..."

Offline bowiemaker

  • Maker of sharp pointy things
  • NCOWS Member
  • Top Active Citizen
  • ***
  • Posts: 539
    • Carter Custom Knives
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: To restructure or not to restructure - that IS the question
« Reply #64 on: December 12, 2011, 02:58:45 PM »
I am seeing a renewed interest in the Old West thanks to current movies like "Cowboys and Aliens" and shows like "Hell on Wheels". If programs like those prove successful, there will be more and we could see a whole new generation of people getting interested.

While Western Action Shooting might be cheap compared to some hobbies and sports, it still is not cheap. Even with Working Cowboy one would need to invest $1000 in firemarms plus clothes, leather, and ammo. Especially among the younger crowd, that is a considerable investment in a tough economy.

I would like to see something less expensive that would attract young people to come out and give it a try. Once they try it, I think they will be hooked and then find it easier to justify spending more for more firearms just to get to shoot more.
NCOWS #3405   RATS #612

Offline Ima Sure Shot

  • Top Active Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 445
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: To restructure or not to restructure - that IS the question
« Reply #65 on: December 13, 2011, 11:08:47 PM »
We already have place for the Greenhorn.  New shooters have up to a year to get their stuff together, unless it is a Regional or National Shoot. Celeste

Offline Major 2

  • "Still running against the wind"
  • Deputy Marshal
  • Top Active Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 15910
  • NCOWS #: 3032
  • GAF #: 785
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 423
Re: To restructure or not to restructure - that IS the question
« Reply #66 on: December 14, 2011, 01:23:05 AM »
Let me clearify , my stand on entry level ....

someone said WC is entry level .... lets look at that.

1  rifle ( least costly as of now,  is the Brazltec Rossi 92 @ about $450 retail )
and say a cartridge revolver @ $350  minimum    ( or if you will used in the $300 range )  so your @ $800 ... forget tax & FFL fees

Now you need to feed those two cartridge arms .... assuming an entry level does not reload (yet)
he'll have to buy factory or reloaded ammo...  factory 45 is running $ 39.50-49.50 in my area , 38spcl. being in the $ 32 range per box of 50 .
now he needs approx. 15 rounds per stage X say 6 stages =  90 rounds per venture or 2 boxes ....
So the fodder for WC is daunting ...

Now lets say there is a Sodbuster ( In lean towared the name "Pioneer" BTW)  Class

1 pistol and one shotgun ...I already shown the cost of start up here ... but just to be fair lets say the same cost for WC pistol above...
here is were this class could shine as stand alone class...

A box of factory loaded 12 guage skeet shells is $ 6.00 - $12 tops  1/3 the cost of rifle ammo. and box of factory loaded 45's could last over two events if used for the pistol only  ...

This could be the factor that allows , a person to get started...there could be a natural evoloution to 3 gun as the person wishes or he might
just , find his nitch as a Pioneer shooting his 1 pistol & 1 shotgun and attending a Regional ....

More than likely , a shotgun of sometype was behind the kitchen door... and surplus CW C&B or conversion was handy as well.

Remember, it's not always the first cost ....

I support , the 1 shotgun, 1 pistol  as National class ( Sodbuster, Pioneer what ever we choose to call it )

an while I at it, I would also support,  1 pistol,  1 rifle & 1 shotgun class.

Making NCOWS , a  2 , 3, or 4 gun , your option , unique organization  :)
when planets align...do the deal !

Offline Cliff Fendley

  • NCOWS Member
  • Top Active Citizen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3700
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 363
Re: To restructure or not to restructure - that IS the question
« Reply #67 on: December 14, 2011, 07:08:30 AM »
Even thought I wouldn't ever shoot it I first thought sodbuster was a good idea. Our posse was asked by our representative and no one showed interest in regularly shooting the sodbuster class.

If it works for a local posse then they can add it but I'm wondering if it's a good idea to add classes that arent going to be well excepted across the board.

Personally I can't see anyone going to the National or Regional shoots and just shooting sodbuster. If they want to shoot their shotgun without a rifle they will have the trap side match.

The new classes that were asked for from our posse were two pistols and a rifle and a pistol only class. Two, three, and four pistols were discussed but as far as I know we didn't come with a final decision on that.

There were also members that asked for a senior WC class.

You also can't always go by the polls on this board since very few members are on here. Reps need to listen to their posse and make the decisions from there. Don't you wish the US government worked that way?
http://www.fendleyknives.com/

NCOWS 3345  RATS 576 NRA Life member

Johnson County Rangers

Offline Major 2

  • "Still running against the wind"
  • Deputy Marshal
  • Top Active Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 15910
  • NCOWS #: 3032
  • GAF #: 785
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 423
Re: To restructure or not to restructure - that IS the question
« Reply #68 on: December 14, 2011, 08:55:34 AM »
I view Senior & Elder as  an * Asterisk  to a class rather than a class onto itself..

what I mean is , The Tally Book allows the Senior or Elder to shoot " any of the above Classes "

If only one Elder is present , he shoots the same class he chooses and has the * Asterisk

I shoot WC, I could also shoot Senior anything ...I see no need hold a class distinction

if a Senior or Elder group, say 3 entrys , wishes  then WC (or anything NCOWS class) can stand alone as their division.

We may have 3-4 at CCC...1 pistol 1 shotgun  entries... We offer the class , two of these shooters travel with me to S. Carolina
when we shot with Saluda Saddle Tramps...they allowed the class...
when planets align...do the deal !

Offline Tjackstephens

  • NCOWS Member
  • Top Active Citizen
  • ***
  • Posts: 1726
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: To restructure or not to restructure - that IS the question
« Reply #69 on: December 14, 2011, 09:35:23 AM »
I am going to make one more post and then keep quite. If age means nothing and you have entry level classes, then why would you have a boys and girl class (12-17)? Yes I know that Seniors and Elders have more know how and the boys and girls are just learning. Age does play a big part in what your are able to do. If you think not then watch me shoot on a stage that has a lot of movement and watch a 30 year old. Think we are forgetting that this is a sport that we compete in. If not why do we have first, second, and third in our classes?
On the shotgun and handgun class, we have offered Town Tamer, Lawman, or whatever you want to call it for the last two years. We have had one person shoot it once. The folks that shoot working cowboy and Range Det.(two handguns and a rifle) just don't like the shotgun. 
If we really think that a sod buster, Town Tamer would bring more members, then let us offer it and Range Det. on a trial. Say over the next two years and see if it works. But not do away with Elders, Seniors, or boys and girls. Yes with mens and womens that would be four more classes. At the National and Regionals what does those metals or slips of paper cost? Tj
Texas Jack Stephens:   NRA, NCOWS #2312,  SASS # 12303, Hiram's Ranger #22,  GAF #641, USFA-CSS # 185, BOSS# 174,  Hartford Lodge 675, Johnson County Rangers,  Green River Gunslingers, Col. Bishop's Renegades, Kentucky Col.

Offline Ima Sure Shot

  • Top Active Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 445
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: To restructure or not to restructure - that IS the question
« Reply #70 on: December 14, 2011, 10:57:36 AM »
This is the way I understand our current system. A person who is over 60 yrs. may shoot any of the classes, except the 17ys. and under.  However, If they so choose they may register in the Senior Class, and only compete against persons that are at least as old as themselves.  In the Senior class they may use one hand, two hands, black powder, modern, and/or any combination. It is a four/three gun class depending on the posse. Our posse shoots, one rifle, one handgun, one shotgun.  Working cowboy does not split out by age, black powder, one, two hand. There was some confusion about this at one National shoot. Thus the request at our club meeting for a class called Senior Working Cowboy. Over 60yrs. and only two guns. Less ammo and guns to carry, eaiser on older folks.  Not only do we move slower, but most of us have arms that are too short and even with glasses we cannot see our front sight as clearly as we once could.  Can't see the gnat let alone the hair.
                                                                                                                                                                                     
 Texas Jack, the medals given at the National Shoot cost NCOWS , I believe around three dollars each. In the past there have been several classes that only had one or two persons registered at the National or Regional.  Those persons got a first place medal, or second place if there were only two.  Therefore there are many more gold medals given out for first (only one person in a class) and second (silver  two persons in a class) than bronze third place medals. Medals were ordered by NCOWS Executive Committe in a large Batch to cut down on the cost. Thus they have no name of the event, class nor date.  There is a set up fee for striking them. They are given out at the National Shoot, and if a club wants to purchase them for a club shoot they may do so.  I never saw a cost for clubs ordering them.  Certificate paper is much less than that. Thus the reasoning to give out certificates at our shoots.Celeste

Offline Irish Dave

  • Retired Marshal
  • NCOWS Member
  • Top Active Citizen
  • ***
  • Posts: 4775
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 2
Re: To restructure or not to restructure - that IS the question
« Reply #71 on: December 14, 2011, 11:06:54 AM »
Just a correction:

Senior and Elder classes, according to the Bylaws, indicate that the shooter "may use any of the above shooting styles"

It doesn't say "classes."  Senior and Elder age-based classes are conducted by themselves and are currently 4-gun classes. Within the those classes, a shooter can use BP or smokeless, one-hand or two. That's what the Bylaws means by shooting styles.

For the time being, at least, Senior and Elder are 4-gun classes. There seems to be some good rationale, IMHO, for looking at those classes and determining whether or not they should remain 4-gun classes.





Dave Scott aka Irish Dave
NCOWS Marshal Retired
NCOWS Senator and Member 132-L
Great Lakes Freight & Mining Co.
SASS 5857-L
NRA Life

irishdave5857@aol.com

Offline Cash Creek

  • NCOWS Member
  • Top Active Citizen
  • ***
  • Posts: 656
  • In GOD we trust..all others cash only..
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: To restructure or not to restructure - that IS the question
« Reply #72 on: December 14, 2011, 11:32:58 AM »
Just my two cents worth, I think maybe we need a two handguns one rifle class just because some of the Senior and Elder are getting older and don't want to shoot a shotgun..and face it we just don't move like we use too..CC
Hiram Ranger #100, Westside Sportsmen Club, NCOWS 3395, SASS 90169, NRA, Col. Bishop's Renegades... Cowgirls are like barbed wire…handle with care.

Offline Major 2

  • "Still running against the wind"
  • Deputy Marshal
  • Top Active Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 15910
  • NCOWS #: 3032
  • GAF #: 785
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 423
Re: To restructure or not to restructure - that IS the question
« Reply #73 on: December 14, 2011, 12:45:32 PM »
TJ ..I did mean to imply  "age means nothing me"

The reason for Youth class , I believe is the Caliber & Parent or Gardian partisapation

My point was an Elder or Senior may shoot any class (per the Tally Book)

what I tring to say is  Working Cowboy as an example:

1 class for all WC shooters...then within the WC class sub divide  for * Elder ** Senior and + Ladies.

there is one list of entrants in WC  ...

Working Cowboy  
1.  Name  ..... etc.... total time  
 2.  Name  .... etc ...total time        
                          
3 ** Name ..etc...total time             (Here is the **Elder)
   
                         He knows he was 1st. best ** Elder and knows how he finished , compaired to younger shooters  , rather than in classed by himself.                  
  4.  Name ...etc....total Time
   5.  + Ladies Name ...etc ...total time   ( may be the only lady entrant, but she knows she bested all comers  6- however many ? )

I don't want to exclude senior or elders...(heck I'm one )

I rather not be in class all by my lonesome ( if I'm the only Elder or senior shooting that day )




 
      
when planets align...do the deal !

Offline Ima Sure Shot

  • Top Active Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 445
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: To restructure or not to restructure - that IS the question
« Reply #74 on: December 14, 2011, 04:39:08 PM »
All -I owe an apology  to the Elders. Seniors may not register in the Elders class.  One must admit to being 70 to do that....However, as I read the by-laws an Elder may register in the Senior Class.

Also if it is an NCOWS sanctioned shoot, one must offer all the classes. Not," and a ladies class". There is a Women's Elder, Women's Senior,Working Cowgirl, Women's Smokeless Shootist, Women's Smokeless Duelist, Women's Blackpowder Shootist, Women's Blackpowder Duelist, Women's Pistoleer, and if there three of them Women's Originals.

Dave, there are only 2 classes that have the number of guns specified in the by-laws, they are: Working Cowboy and the Originals. As specified in the By-Laws one pistol/ revolver, one rifle. That is 2 guns.  Several Classes have been over the years shot with 4 guns but that is not what the bylaws say, and some clubs- I was told- only use one revolver  in some classes that most think of as 4 gun. Style of shooting is different than class of shooting.However Style of shooting in some cases Determines Class when one registers to shoot. For example,"Do you shoot one handed or two? (Style) Do you shoot Blackpowder or Smokeless?"Celeste

Offline Okefinokee Outlaw

  • NCOWS Member
  • Top Active Citizen
  • ***
  • Posts: 348
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: To restructure or not to restructure - that IS the question
« Reply #75 on: December 14, 2011, 06:20:16 PM »
Major,  I believe Elder and Senior are actual classes.

Offline Yuma Kid

  • NCOWS Editor (The Shootist Magazine)
  • NCOWS Member
  • Top Active Citizen
  • ***
  • Posts: 2407
  • John "Yuma Kid" Irons
  • SASS #: 31302
  • NCOWS #: L129
  • GAF #: 767
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 27
Re: To restructure or not to restructure - that IS the question
« Reply #76 on: December 14, 2011, 06:40:10 PM »
All,
I have revised my motion to add Men's & Womens 3 gun 1 revolver, 1 rifle, 1shotgun and allow hosting posses to sub-divide as they wish at Regional and National matches.  Which would leave 16 classes, instead of over 60 classes as we now have.
Yuma

Men's   4-gun   2 revolvers, 1 rifle, 1 shotgun
Men's   3-Gun   2 revolvers, 1 rifle
Men's   2-Gun   1 revolver, 1 rifle
Men's   2-Gun   1 revolver, 1 shotgun
Men's   Pistoleer   2 cap n Ball revolvers, 1 rifle, 1 shotgun
Men's   Original   1 revolver, 1 rifle
Women's   4-gun   2 revolvers, 1 rifle, 1 shotgun
Women's   3-Gun   2 revolvers, 1 rifle
Women's   2-Gun   1 revolver, 1 rifle
Women's   2-Gun   1 revolver, 1 shotgun
Women's   Pistoleer   2 cap n Ball revolvers, 1 rifle, 1 shotgun
Women's   Original   1 revolver, 1 rifle
Boy's 12-17)   2-Gun   1 revolver, 1 rifle
Girl's (12-17)   2-Gun   1 revolver, 1 rifle

Keep Yer Powder Dry!

NCOWS #L129,  G.A.F. # 767, SASS #31302, NRA Life Endowment, Lancaster County Bounty Collection Agentcy #29

Offline Major 2

  • "Still running against the wind"
  • Deputy Marshal
  • Top Active Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 15910
  • NCOWS #: 3032
  • GAF #: 785
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 423
Re: To restructure or not to restructure - that IS the question
« Reply #77 on: December 15, 2011, 01:44:20 AM »
Major,  I believe Elder and Senior are actual classes.

yes Sir !  understood....  they are actual classes....

but I was pointing out they are also a division of the " styles "

I meant,  'as Irish Dave qualified'
"Senior and Elder classes, according to the Bylaws, indicate that the shooter "may use any of the above shooting styles"

My thought was,  WE are NOT eliminating the Seniors or Elders,  rather simply adding them as division within the Classes.

A single Elder or Senior entry ( maybe this only works at the local level ) would not have to stand alone in a class all alone.
He's still be 1st. Elder or Senior in style or class entered.... and see exactly were he placed in relation to non-Senior or Elders...

He could perhaps, best all comers, or finsh in the upper tier of class entries...

Just say'n' .... I'd rather know I was part of a group of "style" shooters with (* )
for my Elder or Senior status, rather than be the only one in a Class. 

when planets align...do the deal !

Offline Pancho Peacemaker

  • NCOWS Texican Senator
  • NCOWS Member
  • Top Active Citizen
  • ***
  • Posts: 1560
  • NCOWS #3120, SASS #75813
    • Pancho's Videos
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: To restructure or not to restructure - that IS the question
« Reply #78 on: December 15, 2011, 06:41:40 AM »
If their is a  group desire to maintain an Elder/Senior class, would folks be opposed to combining them into one class?

I offer:  "Senior."  This would be limited to shooters 65 and older.


NRA - Life
NRA-ILA
TSRA - Life
S&W Collectors Association

 

"A vote is like a rifle: its usefulness depends upon the character of the user."
-T. Roosevelt (1858 - 1919)

Offline Cliff Fendley

  • NCOWS Member
  • Top Active Citizen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3700
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 363
Re: To restructure or not to restructure - that IS the question
« Reply #79 on: December 15, 2011, 07:58:31 AM »
Major, What they are proposing here is not something that will likely have one shooter. There were probably several Working Cowboys at the Nationals last year would have been in the senior division. Plus we don't know how many in the other senior classes may opt to shoot Working Cowboy from time to time rather than pack all those guns around all day.

On a local level we have a fairly large posse and we would have more senior working cowboys then there would be any interest in a sodbuster class. Our rep. has already brought this up at two recent meetings for a show of hands.

Entry level classes are just that and will always have limited shooters if any but the senior classes are going to continue to be fed by the other classes as we grow older.

We need to concentrate on what will be the most excepted classes overall and then let posses add the ones at their local shoots if they have enough interest or feel like they have something that will attract new members.
http://www.fendleyknives.com/

NCOWS 3345  RATS 576 NRA Life member

Johnson County Rangers

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk

© 1995 - 2023 CAScity.com