I am with Coffinmaker on this subject,
Got three of them over the last 30 years.
The first one was an Armi Jager in .357 Mag with 5,5" barrel and plain wooden grips, the 2nd one an Uberti in .45 Colt with 7,5" barrel and PU ivory grips custom fitted.
Finally, for three years til 2023 another Armi Jager in .44-40 with 5,5" barrel again, also a plain Jane version.
They all functioned alright and hit where they were supposed to hit using a Weaver stance.
But getting them out of the holstet is another story.
These Bisleys and I are just not made for each other.
Long Johns Wolf

I got this gun back in February, off the SASS classifieds.  It had only been posted for a short time and I thought the price was fair for a shooter.  This is a 1st generation Frontier Six Shooter.  Well, that's what it is now  .  It can well be called a parts gun.  The frame is from 1883.  I know the loading gate is matching, and it may be the proper hammer, although the firing pin has been replaced with a later style (I was told this up front).  The 44-40 cylinder is not original (different s/n on it), and the grip frame is not original as there are no s/n or other markings at all on those parts.  Italian?  Maybe.  The barrel has no markings, except for a 44 stamped on the underside.  I think this is proper for an acid etched panel that has worn away.  So, I don't know if anything besides the frame is old, but that's good enough for me.  I bought it for what I thought was a decent price for a shooter.  It would be cost-prohibitive to have the barrel set back, especially since it will be rarely shot.  Too bad, but I can live with it.

Notice the brass front sight.  A modern Sure-Hit sight?  No!  It looks to me like the sight had been filed down and someone wanted to build it back up to the original size and profile, using two thin brass pieces.  It actually has the same taper as the original sight.

Okay, so I bought this gun with the intention of shooting it at a CAS match once a year or so, which I do with my other old guns.  It will be paired with my 1901-vintage .45.  So after I get it and I'm looking it over, I see that it has a ginormous cylinder to barrel gap.  I mean huge.  When I shot it, I warned the timer operator to stay behind me!  Also, there is a lot of cylinder wobble.  I determined this to be an over-size hole worn in the front of the frame for the cylinder base pin.  My temporary fix was to wrap some teflon tape around the front of the pin until it was a snug fit in the hole and the wobble is all but gone.  The wood grip is very thin, which feels good in my hand.  But it is also cracked on the left side, and that segment will flex when the grip is off the gun, so I seeped some superglue into the crack.

The first shots were after a match, to test it out.  My 44-40 ammo for pistol is downloaded a little, about 25gr of FFg with some filler, and a 200gr bullet.  The first 4 rounds were fired from a duelist stance at a pistol target about 5 yards away.  They made a nice little group where I was aiming.  Then I fired the last shot one-handed at a Cody Dixon rifle target about 50 yards away and was pleased to hear it ding!  Those first test shots were with the wobbly cylinder before I messed with it.

Then I shot it in a match.  Paired with the previously mentioned .45 plus my 1909 vintage 32-20 '92.  The main spring was super strong in the new .44, so I replaced it with a very light one I had laying around.  That may have been the cause of me having a couple of misfires during the match where I had to go around the cylinder a second time to get it to fire.  You can see it does it on the one video I took.  I finished the match with one miss, but don't recall which gun missed.

Knowing it has a lot of replacement parts, I don't know if it worth the money to get a Colt letter for it, though I am curious if it was originally a .44, so that could possibly be the original barrel.  The 7 1/2" .45 left the factory as a 4 3/4" 38-40, which I found out when a guy at Colt once looked it up for me.

Most parking lots we deal with we park in the ones marked handicap since we both qualify for them and they have enough room that is not a real problem. 

   Some several Lustrum ago, I got this "itch" for Bisley's.  One of the Gal shooters at one of our three day matches was shooting Bisley's and I questioned her about them and she said "Here Ya Go" and handed me her pair to try.  Not onna bet.  I couldn't get 'em out of the holsters clean to shoot and just couldn't make 'em work.  They still look really good but not my cup-a-tea.  Durn It.  Best of luck with 'em.  They are really neat guns.