Author Topic: The banning of shortstrokes  (Read 5909 times)

Ornery Orr

  • Guest
The banning of shortstrokes
« on: December 15, 2005, 08:02:00 PM »
I'm not here to say yay or nay on the way the vote went.  How many of you out there think that people will actually replace their modified toggles with factory ones?  Good pards or not, people are people, Always have been, always will be.  If it's not going to be governed then why even vote on it?  I happen to know a certain person (me) who's wife had a short stroke installed in her '73 because her arms are short.  It only shortens the throw by 1/2".  According to what some have posted in the past, some original toggle link rifles had varying throw distances.  It would be difficult to look at an aftermarket toggle link rifle and compare it to say, for instance, the match directors original rifle and tell that person they're in violation and can't shoot with your club.
   Maybe I'm way off base here, I've been known to do that before, but it seems to me that there are more important issues like GUS CREASES! ;D

Ornery Orr

  • Guest
Re: The banning of shortstrokes
« Reply #1 on: December 15, 2005, 09:35:59 PM »
Yeah Joss, I know, I've read them.  I just don't see the point of making a ruling on something that won't be enforced.  I feel that minimum velocity limits on ammo would have been a more worthwhile discussion topic.  I know, I know, it's already been beat to death also.  ;)

Offline Kayleen

  • Top Active Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 224
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The banning of shortstrokes
« Reply #2 on: December 16, 2005, 06:11:06 AM »
  I have to agree with OO on this. We have seen it quite often in the past. We have a ruling and then it is not enforced. Reasons for that vary froom not wanting to hurt someone's feelings to "if we say something, this person or family will no longer come to our shoots". Flimsy as these may be it does happen. Dead horse,yes this topic is.
  If we make these rules then they NEED to be FOLLOWED by every POSSE.
No, I do not have a short stroke in my rifle, wouldn't dream of it.
Kayleen

Advertising

  • Guest
Re: The banning of shortstrokes
« Reply #3 on: Today at 02:29:11 PM »

Offline French Jack

  • NCOWS Member
  • Top Active Citizen
  • ***
  • Posts: 903
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The banning of shortstrokes
« Reply #3 on: December 16, 2005, 06:21:44 AM »
OO, naturally I cannot speak for other posses, but I can tell you this:  If anyone shows up at our shoots with an obviously shortened action on their rifle, they will not be allowed to shoot it.  No more, no less. 
I also agree with you that there are probably more important items on the agenda.  This was as much for a stand on the "moral high ground" as anything, before we become swept away by an equipment race.  This dead equine has been thoroughly chastened.  Enough said.  Have a Merry Christmas.
French Jack

Ornery Orr

  • Guest
Re: The banning of shortstrokes
« Reply #4 on: December 16, 2005, 06:35:01 AM »
French Jack said it best.  Merry Christmas Everybody!

Offline Grizzle Bear

  • NCOWS Member
  • Top Active Citizen
  • ***
  • Posts: 683
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The banning of shortstrokes
« Reply #5 on: December 16, 2005, 07:29:36 AM »
Talk about "Ghosts of Congresses' Past!"

I am stumped by the notion, put forth by several people, that this can't or won't be enforced.

Easiest thing in the world to check.  My handy-dandy high-tech plastic protractor says that the lever arc of several originals and reproductions I have tested varies from 79 to 82 degrees.  Am I going to call a short-stroke on somebody because their rifle has only 75 degrees of lever arc?  Nope. 

Am I going to call a short-stroke on somebody whose rifle lever only travels 60 degrees or less?  Yep.  But that will be immediately visible, even without a protractor.

Ornery, if the short-stroke in your wife's rifle only shortened the throw a half inch, did it really help her any?  Shortening the buttstock might have been a better idea.  I think it still says something in the By-Laws about NCOWS accomodating people with physical problems.  For a person of really small stature, I wouldn't have a problem with a shortened butt (external modification) or even a short-stroke lever throw.

Think this horse is finally dead, boys.  Best shovel some dirt over it afore it starts to stink!

Grizzle Bear

Rob Brannon
General troublemaker and instigator
NCOWS Senator
NCOWS #357
http://www.ncows.org/KVC.htm
"I hereby swear and attest that I am willing to fight four wild Comanches at arm's length with the ammunition I am shooting in today's match."

Offline Silver Creek Slim

  • Buckaroo
  • Deputy Marshal
  • Top Active Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 18493
  • NCOWS #: 2329
  • GAF #: 144
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 111
Re: The banning of shortstrokes
« Reply #6 on: December 16, 2005, 09:29:20 AM »
Here's a bag of lime, Griz.  ;)

Slim
NCOWS 2329, WartHog, SCORRS, SBSS, BHR, GAF, RBCS, Dirty RATS, BTBM, IPSAC, Cosie-in-training
I love the smell of Black Powder in the morning!

Offline Dr. Bob

  • Dr. Bob
  • Top Active Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 3673
  • Physician and Sporting Gent aka Bob Dorian
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The banning of shortstrokes
« Reply #7 on: December 16, 2005, 08:13:48 PM »
Howdy Slim,

I think yer a little late with the lime.  I kin smell it even thru this here internet gizzmo! ;D 8) ;D :D ;D 8) ;D  We need a back hoe and a deeeeep hole..
Regards, Doc
Dr. Bob Butcher,
NCOWS 2420, Senator
HR 4
GAF 405,
NRA Life,
KGC 8.
Warthog
Motto: Clean mind  -  Clean body,   Take your pick

Offline Delmonico

  • Deputy Marshal
  • Top Active Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 23350
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 1
Re: The banning of shortstrokes
« Reply #8 on: December 17, 2005, 04:18:59 AM »
Griz you have the wisdom of Solomon, a short stroke that ain't got a shorter stroke ain't really a short stroke.  Entomb it in concrete and yer now entitled to cut someone in half with yer sword. ;) Got anyone in mind? ;D
Mongrel Historian


Always get the water for the coffee upstream from the herd.

Ab Ovo Usque ad Mala

The time has passed so quick, the years all run together now.

Offline St. George

  • Deputy Marshal
  • Top Active Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 4828
  • NCOWS , GAF, B.O.L.D., Order of St. George, SOCOM,
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The banning of shortstrokes
« Reply #9 on: December 17, 2005, 09:41:31 AM »
In the Army - 'you' were also in charge of that 'short arm' - and modifying it beyond factory specs wasn't something that was 'command-approved', either...
No 'after-market' add-ons were well thought of.

In the long run - it all came down to 'personal responsibility' - keeping it in good working order - unmodified beyond armory specifications and smoothly functioning - with no additional competition-based accouterments...

Vaya,

Scouts Out!







"It Wasn't Cowboys and Ponies - It Was Horses and Men.
It Wasn't Schoolboys and Ladies - It Was Cowtowns and Sin..."

Offline US Scout

  • Bvt MajGen GAF (Retired)
  • CAS-L Ghost Rider
  • Top Active Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 1157
  • SASS #: 15690
  • GAF #: 3
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 17
Re: The banning of shortstrokes
« Reply #10 on: December 17, 2005, 12:00:12 PM »
St George,

Good one!!!

 ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D

Offline Grizzle Bear

  • NCOWS Member
  • Top Active Citizen
  • ***
  • Posts: 683
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The banning of shortstrokes
« Reply #11 on: December 17, 2005, 06:09:27 PM »
RCJ:

Can't have anything made outa plastic in NCOWS.  Guess I'll have to make a brass one! ;D

GB
 
Rob Brannon
General troublemaker and instigator
NCOWS Senator
NCOWS #357
http://www.ncows.org/KVC.htm
"I hereby swear and attest that I am willing to fight four wild Comanches at arm's length with the ammunition I am shooting in today's match."

Ornery Orr

  • Guest
Re: The banning of shortstrokes
« Reply #12 on: December 17, 2005, 09:11:40 PM »
I do believe the shortened stock would fall under the external modifications guideline.  Yes, the 1/2 did make a difference for her as far as being able to keep the "bobble" out of the front sight when cycling the action, and no, she doesn't have what I would consider to be physical problems.
One more thing.  What kind of certification does one need to become a self proclaimed expert on what is considered to be short stroked and what isn't??? 

SO, Grizzle Bear, since I happen to have a degenerative hip, if I get documentation from my doctor, does that mean I can use my guncart if I come down to one of your shoots?  Since NCOWS accomodates physical problem and all.

Offline Grizzle Bear

  • NCOWS Member
  • Top Active Citizen
  • ***
  • Posts: 683
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The banning of shortstrokes
« Reply #13 on: December 18, 2005, 11:36:33 AM »
Okay, maybe I wasn't clear.

Even though some might consider it an "external modification" I don't have any problem with someone shortening a buttstock to fit their stature.

I tried to let some of the older, gimped up shooters use gun carts, but people took advantage of my kindness.  What we do now is provide a chair or bench for folks to sit on while waiting to shoot.  And as I have a bad back, plus hips and knees, I am often sitting on one of them myself.

Grizzle Bear

Rob Brannon
General troublemaker and instigator
NCOWS Senator
NCOWS #357
http://www.ncows.org/KVC.htm
"I hereby swear and attest that I am willing to fight four wild Comanches at arm's length with the ammunition I am shooting in today's match."

Offline Major Matt Lewis

  • NCOWS Member
  • Top Active Citizen
  • ***
  • Posts: 1234
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The banning of shortstrokes
« Reply #14 on: December 18, 2005, 12:15:58 PM »
Наилучшим образом, Этот вопрос некоторо был побит к смерти. В словах Austin Powers, "почему не будьте вы плашка?" Если вы идете пойти через тревогу иметь пропуск съезда что-то, то вы должны принудить их.

St. George & US Scout,

Когда я был на лагере Lejeune этим летом, морские пехотинцы позволяли grunts доработать и "trick из" их оружий для идя Ирака. Я считал это довольно отличающимся от когда я пошел к персидский залива назад в 1991.

 ;D ;)
Major Matt Lewis
Grand Army of the Frontier * SASS Life * NCOWS * Powder Creek Cowboys * Free State Ranges * RO II * NRA Life * Man on the Edge

Offline Black River Smith

  • Top Active Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 1188
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 46
Re: The banning of shortstrokes
« Reply #15 on: December 18, 2005, 01:47:19 PM »
I have a 14" pull compared to the standard 13".  I modified my custom Marlin (created in 1992) to that 14" pull and it works great but I just would not do the same to my original Win 73 or repro Win 66.  So I live with the shorter pull.

I do not see a cut and replaced butt plate as a drastic mod.   Now if you started putting in a pistol hole grip or finger grooves on the forarm or installing a scope mounts or a large circle loop lever, then those would be an external mod in my opinion.

If you are worried about resale, well then that is a different story.


Black River Smith
Black River Smith

Offline Lone Gunman

  • CAS-L Ghost Rider
  • Top Active Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 1501
  • The Lone Gunman ...as himself
    • Lone-Gunman.com
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The banning of shortstrokes
« Reply #16 on: December 18, 2005, 01:53:32 PM »
I do believe the shortened stock would fall under the external modifications guideline. 

That would be a good point to make...over on the SASSwire, since it's a SASS rule NOT an NCOWS rule.  ;)

Please indulge me while I quote myself from a couple of months ago:

Quote
"Internal vs External modifications”.  The single greatest improvement we could make in our online discussions of NCOWS rules is to actually refer to NCOWS rules during the discussions. The ‘internal/external mod’ rule is a SASS rule, not NCOWS. Everyone who posts on these forums has a computer, our rules are readily available at http://www.ncows.org/Bylaws.htm  Interlacing SASS rules in NCOWS discussions just confuses the dog poop out of folks…please don’t do it!

George "Lone Gunman" Warnick

"...A man of notoriously vicious & intemperate disposition"

Offline Will Ketchum

  • Chief of Detectives
  • Deputy Marshal
  • Top Active Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 2794
  • Pete Ersland
  • SASS #: 4222
  • NCOWS #: 133
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The banning of shortstrokes
« Reply #17 on: December 18, 2005, 02:03:50 PM »
Well said George.  Some need reminding from time to time.

Will Ketchum
Will Ketchum's Rules of W&CAS: 1 Be Safe. 2 Have Fun. 3  Look Good Doin It!
F&AM, NRA Endowment Life, SASS Life 4222, NCOWS Life 133.  USMC for ever.
Madison, WI

Offline Black River Smith

  • Top Active Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 1188
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 46
Re: The banning of shortstrokes
« Reply #18 on: December 18, 2005, 11:27:07 PM »
Well stated LG.  I do like quoting the by-laws, sometimes, but it sound better coming from you.


Black River Smith
Black River Smith

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk

© 1995 - 2023 CAScity.com