Quote from: 1961MJS on October 11, 2024, 04:33:34 PMHi, I've shot a full sized 86, and it's a JOY to shoot. 8 in the tube and one in the chamber, its a bit heavy on the front end, which helps a LOT.I suspect the smaller magazine capacity might also have been a factor with the '86 carbine. Folks used to having the "firepower" of the '73, when that might have been a concern before the effective end of the Indian Wars, might have been put off by having "only" 8 rounds in the magazine. It would also depend on what a prospective buyer figured to be going after, like moose, elk or griz, especially if the shooter wasn't confident of putting game down with "only" a few shots. I've owned several '86's where the barrels and magazines had been shortened so the mag only held four or five rounds, and never felt undergunned, especially with one chambered for .33 WCF, with a 3/4 magazine. BTW, the .33 WCF was smokeless only, with jacketed flat softpoint bullets. That cartridge was introduced in the '86 in 1903, lasting until the M71, a modified '86 was introduced in .348 WCF. The 33 was a great cartridge and I took down several wild boar down to Tennessee back in '63. IMHO, when Miroko started making '86's, they should have taken the .33 and "blown" the shoulder to improved, and kept the .338" bullet (if Hornady had kept the FSP in production) for better sectional density.
Later
Page created in 0.102 seconds with 17 queries.