OFFICIAL 1861 thread (post pictures here)

Started by Hoof Hearted, November 17, 2012, 11:26:33 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Major 2

I cut the 61 barrel to 3" Avenging Angel.  it was 7.5 " OEM From EMF
I later acquire a new 51 barrel and had it lined .357 as well and the gun sort of dual barrel dual roll piece.

I suppose one could acquire a 61 barrel as well... having three barrels.  :-\   
when planets align...do the deal !

Graveyard Jack

This is my pseudo-1861 Richards-Mason. It was an 1860 Type II in .38Spl that I fitted a Navy grip frame and factory pearls to.



Here's an early Cimarron ASM Navy.



This weird thing is a CVA/ASM Navy with the Legal Defender conversion and a non-functioning ejector.

SASS #81,827

Long Johns Wolf

2nd Gen Colt 1861 Navy RM conversion in .38 Long Colt for comparison.
Barrel was cut to 6" to make it a bit faster on the draw.
Long Johns Wolf
BOSS 156, CRR 169 (Hon.), FROCS 2, Henry Board, SCORRS, STORM 229, SV Hofheim 1938, VDW, BDS, SASS

Abilene

Quote from: Long Johns Wolf on July 06, 2024, 01:41:11 AM
2nd Gen Colt 1861 Navy RM conversion in .38 Long Colt for comparison.
Barrel was cut to 6" to make it a bit faster on the draw.
Long Johns Wolf

Nedbal?

Long Johns Wolf

Yes, Sir.
This is its Nedbal-Uberti twin.
Note 4-screw frame.
Long Johns Wolf
BOSS 156, CRR 169 (Hon.), FROCS 2, Henry Board, SCORRS, STORM 229, SV Hofheim 1938, VDW, BDS, SASS

Abilene


Coffinmaker


:)  Graveyard  :D

Your pseudo 1861 is just too kool.  I really like the barrel at the Ejector Housing as well.  The gun just looks "right" and well balanced   ;D

Graveyard Jack

Quote from: Coffinmaker on July 07, 2024, 09:44:19 AM
:)  Graveyard  :D

Your pseudo 1861 is just too kool.  I really like the barrel at the Ejector Housing as well.  The gun just looks "right" and well balanced   ;D
Thanks! I originally wanted to reshape the barrel lug to mimic the 1861 R-M's but that never happened. Sorta got attached to it the way it is. I know it's a little beefier and heavier than a real `61 but I really like it.
SASS #81,827

Abilene

Quote from: Graveyard Jack on July 08, 2024, 05:07:14 PM
Thanks! I originally wanted to reshape the barrel lug to mimic the 1861 R-M's but that never happened. Sorta got attached to it the way it is. I know it's a little beefier and heavier than a real `61 but I really like it.
Me, too.  :)  And anyway, reshaping the barrel is way above my pay grade, and the ejector would still be wrong for a R-M.


Cheyenne Logan


Cheyenne Logan

ORIGINAL AND REPRODUCTION :o

© 1995 - 2024 CAScity.com