Author Topic: 4.75" vs 5.5" barrel?  (Read 20735 times)

Offline Coffinmaker

  • Top Active Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 7088
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 88
Re: 4.75" vs 5.5" barrel?
« Reply #20 on: September 19, 2022, 08:26:21 AM »

 :) BILTMORE  ;)

That be a right nice Snubbie.  I also have always preferred short(er) barrels.  I have cut the barrel sets I have for my Open Tops at the Ejector Rod Housing (4 7/8) and all of my Cap Guns are SNUBBIES. 

I recently finished a pair 1860 Conversions (8 inch barrels) I haven't cut yet.  Rest assured they will get cut, very difficult and SLOW for me to shoot.  Fun for a day or two but that'll be it.  (Hacksaw MacGurk is drooling).

Offline RattlesnakeJack

  • Deputy Marshal
  • Top Active Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 1849
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 5
Re: 4.75" vs 5.5" barrel?
« Reply #21 on: September 22, 2022, 12:00:21 AM »
I personally prefer 5.5" over 4.75" … and in fact, more of my revolvers are 7.5" than either of the shorter lengths … I'm not very fast, anyway, so I go with the look I like!

Somebody mentioned that many Fast Draw competitors prefer the short barrel, and I gather that similar considerations also drive the preference of many Cowboy Mounted Shooting competitors, based on what I was told recently by a chap considering getting into that sport, who passed on a pair of 5.5" Ruger New Vaqueros I am thinking of selling.  Calibre (.45 Colt) was right for him, but apparently the advice he is getting is to stick with the shorter barrel (4 ⅝" in the Rugers) for ease of clearing the holster and reholstering while mounted …  Of course, in that sport they aren't trying to shoot a bullet accurately … just need to project all that burning powder and fouling in the direction of each balloon ...
Rattlesnake Jack Robson, Scout, Rocky Mountain Rangers, North West Canada, 1885
Major John M. Robson, Royal Scots of Canada, 1883-1901
Sgt. John Robson, Queen's Own Rifles of Canada, 1885
Bvt. Col, Commanding International Dept. and Div.  of Canada, Grand Army of the Frontier

Offline Modoc

  • Top Active Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 309
  • Editor, Shasta Regulators State of Jefferson
    • Shasta Regulators
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 12
Re: 4.75" vs 5.5" barrel?
« Reply #22 on: September 22, 2022, 09:26:27 PM »
The length didn’t matter to me, but when I went on large bore to small ( .44 to 38) I noticed a difference in handling.  My 4-5/8” 38’s balance the same as my 5-1/2” 44’s. 

Sadly, I sold the 44’s because my hands didn’t like the recoil at the time (regret it :-\). Stayed with the 38’s for ease and economy with 5 of us shooting, even though it is now 3.
Modoc

"He Who Laughs Last, Thinks Fastest"
SUDDS, SCORRS, Retired Warthog, Sometime Gunfighter, and Soot Deliante

Offline Abilene

  • CAS-L Ghost Rider
  • Top Active Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 4186
    • Abilene's CAS Pages
  • SASS #: 27489
  • NCOWS #: 3958
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 730
Re: 4.75" vs 5.5" barrel?
« Reply #23 on: September 22, 2022, 11:07:50 PM »
:)  NECROMANCY is FUN!!)

Somebody please stand by with a Defibrillator for Abilene please.  ...

Hey Coffinmaker, ChuteTheMall is the one who brought back this oldie, don't point that defribrillator at me!  :)

As for the original question, 4 3/4" vs 5 1/2", well it's kinda a Ginger or MaryAnn thing.

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk

© 1995 - 2022 CAScity.com