The system... where this is concerned..... "stinks"...
I am rather upset about this..and I would imagine that the council members don't much like this either.. ... but there isn't a darn thing that they can do about it. Legally, they are between a rock and a hard place.
I have loudly voiced my opinion on it ( I know that you all on the forum are shocked to hear THAT..

..yeahhh rightttt)

And I was told all the details involved. The property owner has to do nothing where this is concerned. Because of "legal" paperwork.
Legal Smegal... I don't care about all of that! I believe anyone who buys property should be liable for it no matter what. If it makes a profit.. great.. if it doesn't and goes to crap.. then that is the chance you take too!
It is NOT the city's (us) responsibility to take care of someone else's bad or good purchases.
I realize that there is always 2 sides to look at a situation, but I am so tired of legal loopholes that take away and skirt peoples responsibilities. If the building was in this shape ( and it was) when the owners bought it....and they knew that they didn't have the financial means to repair it.. then why buy it? Why knowingly buy a liability with no intention of making it an asset?
I would love to start discussing it.(I've probably said too much already)

. but to be honest.. I feel that I can't, ( for personal reasons) so please understand why I am having to stand on the sidelines gritting my teeth on this subject.