Author Topic: Infantry vs Cavalry - Indian Wars  (Read 7100 times)

Offline hatman

  • Top Active Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 242
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 4
Infantry vs Cavalry - Indian Wars
« on: July 09, 2016, 07:57:06 PM »
I hadn't really that about this before, but lately it's piqued my curiosity.  Google didn't find me an answer.

During the Indian Wars period in the American West, what was the mode of transportation for Infantry troops?
Did they ride horses as the cavalry did?
Surely they didn't walk all those vast distances did they or if not horses did they ride in wagons or something?
If they did ride horses what then were the effective differences between infantry and cavalry.

Might sound like dumbass questions, but it's bugging me.  :)

Offline Drydock

  • MA1 USN ret. GAF #19, Colonel, Chief of Staff. BC, CC, SoM. SASS 1248 Life
  • American Plainsmen Society
  • Top Active Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 4831
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 18
Re: Infantry vs Cavalry - Indian Wars
« Reply #1 on: July 09, 2016, 08:12:05 PM »
Depending on early or late in the IW era: early (1860s, 1870s,) it was often steamboat up the nearest river.  Then on foot to what ever destination.  Later in the period it was most often train to the nearest location, then again on foot.  

This is not as slow as you might think.  A tired horse moves no faster than a walking man.  Miles and the 5th infantry pursued a force of Sioux under Sitting Bull for nearly 40 miles at Cedar Creek, before the Sioux dispersed in frustration, unable to shake the "Walks a Heaps" as a body.

It was not until motorized transportation became common that the infantry gave up cross country marching.  Even then, European armies continued to burn foot leather for several more generations.  During WW2, British infantry often bitterly complained of their "coddled" American counterparts, who were carted on lorries everywhere . . .
Civilize them with a Krag . . .

Offline Professor Marvel

  • purveyor of useless items to the gentry
  • American Plainsmen Society
  • Top Active Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 3081
  • learn from the past, or be doomed to repeat it
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 1118
Re: Infantry vs Cavalry - Indian Wars
« Reply #2 on: July 09, 2016, 11:11:54 PM »
external reference WRT "long combat marches" :

"They can run 50 miles in a day — run, mind you. And then fight a battle at the end."
Lieutenant Gert Adendorff of the 1st/3rd NNC,  Natal Carbineers
at Roark's Drift in reference to the Zulu Warriors.


yhs
prof ( i are retired! i have nottin to do but pester ye!) marvel
Your Humble Servant
~~~~~Professor Algernon Horatio Ubiquitous Marvel The First~~~~~~
President, CEO, Chairman,  and Chief Bottle Washer of


Professor Marvel's
Traveling Apothecary
and
Fortune Telling Emporium


Acclaimed By The Crowned Heads of Europe
Purveyor of Patent Remedies, Snake Oil, Powder, Percussion Caps, Cleaning Supplies, Dry Goods,
and
Picture Postcards

Offering Unwanted Advice for All Occasions
and
Providing Useless Items to the Gentry
Since 1822
[
Available by Appointment for Lectures on Any Topic


Advertising

  • Guest
Re: Infantry vs Cavalry - Indian Wars
« Reply #3 on: Today at 07:33:57 AM »

Offline hatman

  • Top Active Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 242
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 4
Re: Infantry vs Cavalry - Indian Wars
« Reply #3 on: July 10, 2016, 01:50:02 AM »
Depending on early or late in the IW era: early (1860s, 1870s,) it was often steamboat up the nearest river.  Then on foot to what ever destination.  Later in the period it was most often train to the nearest location, then again on foot.  

This is not as slow as you might think.  A tired horse moves no faster than a walking man.  Miles and the 5th infantry pursued a force of Sioux under Sitting Bull for nearly 40 miles at Cedar Creek, before the Sioux dispersed in frustration, unable to shake the "Walks a Heaps" as a body.

It was not until motorized transportation became common that the infantry gave up cross country marching.  Even then, European armies continued to burn foot leather for several more generations.  During WW2, British infantry often bitterly complained of their "coddled" American counterparts, who were carted on lorries everywhere . . .

Thank you for that insight!

I'm thinking now about the Bozeman Trail fort construction.
Do you think the Infantry marched on foot up to each potential fort site?
I guess I'm only asking because I can't imagine walking that far.  :)

Offline Major 2

  • "Still running against the wind"
  • Deputy Marshal
  • Top Active Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 15831
  • NCOWS #: 3032
  • GAF #: 785
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 416
Re: Infantry vs Cavalry - Indian Wars
« Reply #4 on: July 10, 2016, 02:36:47 AM »
as an aside...may I suggest   :)

Iron Riders: Story of the 1890s Fort Missoula Buffalo Soldier Bicycle Corps

https://www.amazon.com/Iron-Riders-Missoula-Buffalo-Soldier/dp/1575100746

http://www.ltolman.org/99arch/ironridersbook.htm
when planets align...do the deal !

Offline Drydock

  • MA1 USN ret. GAF #19, Colonel, Chief of Staff. BC, CC, SoM. SASS 1248 Life
  • American Plainsmen Society
  • Top Active Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 4831
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 18
Re: Infantry vs Cavalry - Indian Wars
« Reply #5 on: July 10, 2016, 09:05:39 AM »
Yes, the Bozeman trail infantry walked to those locations.
Civilize them with a Krag . . .

Offline St. George

  • Deputy Marshal
  • Top Active Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 4827
  • NCOWS , GAF, B.O.L.D., Order of St. George, SOCOM,
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Infantry vs Cavalry - Indian Wars
« Reply #6 on: July 10, 2016, 10:06:54 AM »
Maybe 'you' can't imagine walking that far, but it's the norm for Infantry, and always has been.

Once they got within their river or depot destination, they walked.

If it rained - they walked.

If it snowed - they walked.

If there were dust storms - they walked.

All of these weather conditions were expected and were a part of their profession.

Cavalry walked a lot, too - especially on long campaigns - saving their mounts for when they were really needed.

Hell, straight-leg Infantry walked over most of Europe during WWII, though trucks were increasingly used, but if the trucks couldn't go further - they got out and walked.

Airborne walked, too - a truism in Airborne is that there are, nor there ever will be trucks on the DZ - after landing, they're foot-mounted and with less personal and organizational equipment than the legs.

There are still Manuals extant from those times (and today - FM-21-18 - Foot Marches - dtd 30 August 2009) that give 'Rates of March' that allow Planners to factor in just how long it might take, and over what terrain they can expect for their Infantry to arrive at the battlefield - and when they do arrive, they're ready to fight.

Scouts Out!

"It Wasn't Cowboys and Ponies - It Was Horses and Men.
It Wasn't Schoolboys and Ladies - It Was Cowtowns and Sin..."

Offline Trailrider

  • CAS-L Ghost Rider
  • Top Active Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 2366
    • Gunfighter Zone
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Infantry vs Cavalry - Indian Wars
« Reply #7 on: July 10, 2016, 11:26:29 AM »
There were some instances during the Indian Wars where the infantry were mounted on horses or mules.  BGen George Crook did mount some of his infantry on horses and mules during his portion of the Big Horn & Yellowstone Expedition of 1876.  As many of these doughfoots had never been on a horse, the initial results were a "rodeo", much to the amusement of the cavalry troops present who watched the spectacle.  There were other instances of using mounted infantry, though I can't pick them out just now.

It is true that a human, if in good physical condition can "walk down" a horse. The Apache warriors did it quite often. Cavalry travelling over country where their horses cannot obtain sufficient feed, may wind up not only dismounted, but using their mounts for their own rations.  Examples of this are the "starvation march" of Crook's troops following the Rosebud Battle, as well as the 26th Infantry in the Phillipines during the first part of WWII.
Ride to the sound of the guns, but watch out for bushwhackers! Godspeed to all in harm's way in the defense of Freedom! God Bless America!

Your obedient servant,
Trailrider,
Bvt. Lt. Col. Commanding,
Southern District
Dept. of the Platte, GAF

Offline Drydock

  • MA1 USN ret. GAF #19, Colonel, Chief of Staff. BC, CC, SoM. SASS 1248 Life
  • American Plainsmen Society
  • Top Active Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 4831
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 18
Re: Infantry vs Cavalry - Indian Wars
« Reply #8 on: July 10, 2016, 12:51:23 PM »
"Well, after the first few hundred thousand miles, a man gets limber on his feet."
Civilize them with a Krag . . .

Offline hatman

  • Top Active Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 242
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 4
Re: Infantry vs Cavalry - Indian Wars
« Reply #9 on: July 10, 2016, 01:22:48 PM »
Thanks guys!  My itch is scratched.  :)

Offline Grenadier

  • Top Active Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 484
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Infantry vs Cavalry - Indian Wars
« Reply #10 on: July 10, 2016, 01:55:08 PM »
Just imagine the poor Roman legionaries after the Marius reforms. Everywhere you went you walked, you walked in armour, you carried your weapons, your food rations, entrenching equipment, two pilum (Roman spears), your shield (one extant shield is 18lbs) and all the while wearing hobnailed boots with no insole or arch support.

Offline Scattered Thumbs

  • Top Active Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 1289
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 61
Re: Infantry vs Cavalry - Indian Wars
« Reply #11 on: July 11, 2016, 08:26:22 AM »
Just imagine the poor Roman legionaries after the Marius reforms. Everywhere you went you walked, you walked in armour, you carried your weapons, your food rations, entrenching equipment, two pilum (Roman spears), your shield (one extant shield is 18lbs) and all the while wearing hobnailed boots with no insole or arch support.

And they did that all over Europe.

Napoleon army did the same. As far as Moscow.

Offline St. George

  • Deputy Marshal
  • Top Active Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 4827
  • NCOWS , GAF, B.O.L.D., Order of St. George, SOCOM,
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Infantry vs Cavalry - Indian Wars
« Reply #12 on: July 11, 2016, 08:36:49 AM »
And back...
"It Wasn't Cowboys and Ponies - It Was Horses and Men.
It Wasn't Schoolboys and Ladies - It Was Cowtowns and Sin..."

Offline Charles Isaac

  • Grand Army of the Frontier
  • American Plainsmen Society
  • Top Active Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 695
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Infantry vs Cavalry - Indian Wars
« Reply #13 on: July 11, 2016, 08:38:06 AM »



    So, what is the number one reason to NOT join the infantry? ;)







Offline The Pathfinder

  • Top Active Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 642
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 7
Re: Infantry vs Cavalry - Indian Wars
« Reply #14 on: July 11, 2016, 09:02:53 AM »
Almost makes ya' appreciate saddle sores...almost. ;)

Offline Pitspitr

  • Deputy Marshal
  • Top Active Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 4592
  • 308 214-0082 45551 Rd 816, Sargent NE 68874 USA
    • Grand Army of the Frontier
  • SASS #: 74523
  • NCOWS #: L187
  • GAF #: 147
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 2
Re: Infantry vs Cavalry - Indian Wars
« Reply #15 on: July 11, 2016, 12:05:39 PM »
So, what is the number one reason to NOT join the infantry? ;)
::)
You enjoy the flavor of horse meat? :o
I remain, Your Ob'd Servant,
Jerry M. "Pitspitr" Davenport
(Bvt.)Brigadier General Commanding,
Grand Army of the Frontier
BC/IT, Expert, Sharpshooter, Marksman, CC, SoM
NRA CRSO, RVWA IIT2; SASS ROI, ROII;
NRA Benefactor Life; AZSA Life; NCOWS Life

Offline Dusty Tagalon

  • NCOWS Member
  • Top Active Citizen
  • ***
  • Posts: 828
  • SASS 32291, NCOWS L170, GAF 74
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 2
Re: Infantry vs Cavalry - Indian Wars
« Reply #16 on: July 11, 2016, 08:05:22 PM »
Crooks command heading up the Rosebud had the Infantry on Mules. Although the Cavalry was amused.  With the help of the Teamsters, they were ready to go after 2 days training.

Dusty

Offline Niederlander

  • American Plainsmen Society
  • Top Active Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 3099
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 6
Re: Infantry vs Cavalry - Indian Wars
« Reply #17 on: July 11, 2016, 08:52:18 PM »
::)
You enjoy the flavor of horse meat? :o
Horse can be pretty darned good!
"There go those Nebraskans, and all hell couldn't stop them!"

Offline Scattered Thumbs

  • Top Active Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 1289
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 61
Re: Infantry vs Cavalry - Indian Wars
« Reply #18 on: July 12, 2016, 01:32:47 AM »

Offline FTrooper

  • Top Active Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 231
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Infantry vs Cavalry - Indian Wars
« Reply #19 on: July 29, 2016, 03:41:46 PM »
Walk was most common. Occasionally they rode in Wagons and one officer even designed a special troop carrying wagon (early APC you might say). At the Big Hole in 1877 the 7th infantry rode in wagons. General Miles mounted most of the 5th Infantry on captured Sioux ponies for the later half of the 1870's.

Chris Fischer
F Troop
Chris Fischer
F-Troop

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk

© 1995 - 2023 CAScity.com