While attending the N-SSA 2011 Spring National, “Oz” (Osborne) at Lodgewood showed me a M1865 Spencer (one of the Burnside contract carbines) he had recently acquired that he said had been “professionally restored”. No sooner had I held it in my hands, shouldered it, and glanced down the mint-like bore, I wouldn’t turn it loose or lay it down for fear someone else might not hesitate to buy it. I bought it and though it would have been great to have shot it at National, I waited until I got back home to fit it up with a new center-fire block.
It was while I was trying to install the new center-fire block that was when I really began to notice just how tight the action was. Unlike most restorations, when you remove any metal in the restoration process, parts generally get smaller not bigger, and the breech on this carbine is so tight, the first time I tried to lower the breech, I near sliced my finger on the trigger as my finger passed by. But I found the action to be just as tight with the lower block and rim-fire block it came with, as well as with another M1865 lower block I had on hand, and I was never able to install a center-fire block because I found the length of the opening in the receiver to be nearly a 1/10th inch too short for the block!
Not long afterwards, I happened across another carbine that had recently sold for $9500, and low and behold if its serial number (8802) identified it as out of the very same lot of carbines delivered in mid-June 1865. Though I had suspected that my carbine wasn’t all original, enough of the carbine appeared to be original that I began wondering whether the story Oz gave me about it being “professionally restored” was indeed true or not. Below is a link to the photos of the other carbine (8802) and you can see for yourself why I was so curious.
http://whiskey-wolf.tumblr.com/post/27286027352/spencer-model-1865-carbine-one-of-the-finestOh don’t get me wrong, since then I have re-examined the carbine by direct comparison with other carbines, and while I believe the receiver, upper and lower blocks, and lever (and their internal parts) are indeed all original, certain other parts appear to be replicas (i.e. barrel band and band spring; forend and butt-stock; rear swivel, hammer and hammer screw, and the sling bar with staple and ring).
But because the action was so tight, I wondered whether the other carbine had been just as tight? So I rang up the dealer that had recently sold the other carbine, and inquired of the tightness of the action, which sure enough the dealer related how that carbine (which was in nearly mint condition) was also exceedingly tight, just as mine appeared to be.
While these other parts appear to be replica parts, they appear simply too finely made to have been made by Armisport, and though they may have been custom-made, I cannot determine whether they were made by The Rifle Shoppe or exactly who made the parts. I suspect that the initials “HBT” in the inspector’s cartouche could possibly identify the restorer’s initials but that is mere speculation. Though I have not yet had the carbine all into pieces to see what might be marked beneath the wood, it’s not a Romano because the parts of his rifles don’t interchange with original parts, nor does even the magazine. And even though it may not be all original, if someone is making these as replicas, they most certainly have missed an opportunity to market them.
Photos to follow and added by Two Flints