I finally had a chance to get to the range and do some chronograph work today. I didn't have enough time to shoot for accuracy, have to save that for another day.
Marlin 336 Cowboy 38-55, DD Big Lube 250 grain bullet with SPGLoaded with equal volumes of each powder. Actual weight as shown below:
43 grains Goex Express FFFg = 1350 ft/sec, 129 ES
42 grains Swiss FFFg = 1321 ft/sec, 29 ES
39.8 grains Olde Enysford FFFg = 1281 ft/sec, 64 ES
Ruger Old Army, 7-1/2" bblCharge weights are nominal by volume measurement
Round Ball30 grains Goex FFFg = 849 ft/sec, ES 61
30 grains Olde Eynsford = 948 ft/sec, ES 54
35 grains Goex FFFg = 868 ft/sec, ES 152
35 grains Olde Eynsford FFFg = 1023 ft/sec, ES 41
DD/PUK/ROAII Bullet (220 grains)30 grains Goex FFFg = 807 ft/sec, ES 74
30 grains Olde Eynsford FFFg = 883 ft/sec, ES 54
My results parallel those of w44wcf in that equal volumes of Olde E are less energetic than Swiss, but equal weights would probably be comparable. The thing I found interesting was that Goex Express gave higher velocities than either Swiss or Olde E on an equal volume basis.
This seems to fly in the face of everything I've seen and heard previously. Unfortunately, I have no more Express to run any more tests with.
Also, considering that Olde E is only slight more expensive than regular Goex ($14.90 vs. $16.00 delivered - or 7% more), it would appear that compared to using regular Goex for normal CAS matches, you can back down charges 25% to 30% and achieve the same velocity. Note above that 30 grains of Olde E pushes a round ball 80 ft/sec faster than 35 grains of regular Goex. I'll back down more on my next outing - to 25 grains (instead of 35). I'll also throttle back the DD/PUK bullet - it's a handful. Thus, Olde E is significantly more economical.
All-in-all a very interesting day. I'm looking forward to more tinkering with Olde E.