Javascript DHTML Drop Down Menu Powered by dhtml-menu-builder.com
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 28, 2015, 09:04:48 pm

Login with username, password and session length

Search:     Advanced search
* Home FlashChat Help Calendar Login Register
Currently there are 0 Users in the Cas City Chat Rooms!
Cas City Forum Hall & CAS-L  |  Special Interests - Groups & Societies  |  STORM (Moderator: Major 2)  |  Topic: Soooo, wheres' the 72 44/40's ???? 0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Soooo, wheres' the 72 44/40's ????  (Read 3687 times)
Abilene
Top Active Citizen
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1612



WWW
« Reply #25 on: October 15, 2012, 11:14:05 pm »

Okay, I understand what you are saying about the star, although it seems that no shaving of the sides would be necessary if the brass all dropped in to the .45 cylinder okay.  Anyway, I'm gonna play the naysayer here and explain why I don't think it can be done.  First, with a .38 cylinder, like I told Jake I think the bolt notches on those are deeper than the .44's and '45's.  So yeah, it could be done but who would want to knowing the bolt notches are very likely to get blown out, even if they knew it would still be functional.  I had heard that some of the early .45 S&W Opentop cylinders had the bolt notches accidently cut to the .38 depth by Uberti and a lot of those blew out.  Now, if it turns out that info about the .38 notches being deeper is not correct, then I withdraw my comments  Smiley

And as for using a .44 Colt cylinder, 44 Colt brass is slightly longer than the straight portion of 44-40 below the neck.  So you couldn't re-chamber the cylinder with the necked portion where it needs to be, the hole is already too big at that point.  I think Uberti made some early OT's in .44 Russian.  I know they were marked that way.  If the cylinder was actually chambered for .44 Russian, and you could find one of those, now THAT would work for re-chambering!  Otherwise a machinist would have to manufacture a cylinder from scratch (Hey Raven, how much would that cost?  Grin )

disclaimer: I'm not a gunsmith!  So if my logic is incorrect, let me know.  Because I think a 44-40 OT would be way cool, too.  And certainly no more problematic than a 45LC OT.  
Logged

Coffinmaker
Top Active Citizen
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1828


« Reply #26 on: October 16, 2012, 12:13:26 am »


Abilene,

You are correct about the cylinder notches on the .38 cylinder.  They are cut some (I've never actually measured how much) deeper than a .45 cylinder.  More recent guns from Uberti have also spit the bottom of the notch out but other than looking a little funny, they function just fine.
My first set of Open Tops were chambered .45 Schofield.  Then I added .44 and .38 barrel/cylinder sets.  Really versatile.  My main match guns for about 10 years.  Finally had to replace a worn firing pin.  Once set up, really reliable guns.  When I shoot them as 45s, I shoot a real light gamer load and have had no problems. Knock Wood!

Coffinmaker
Logged
Raven
American Plainsmen Society
Top Active Citizen
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 465



WWW
« Reply #27 on: October 16, 2012, 10:23:09 am »

One-Off custom made cylinders ....about $800  Shocked

Raven
Logged
Coffinmaker
Top Active Citizen
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1828


« Reply #28 on: October 16, 2012, 11:14:10 pm »


And ..... The chamber walls are still going to be ..... too thin.

Coffinmaker
Logged
Raven
American Plainsmen Society
Top Active Citizen
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 465



WWW
« Reply #29 on: October 17, 2012, 12:18:33 am »

Quote
And ..... The chamber walls are still going to be ..... too thin.

Coffinmaker


I agree!!!!

Raven
Logged
Justician
Very Active Citizen
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 63


« Reply #30 on: October 23, 2012, 03:03:18 pm »

If I wanted to have a spare Opentop for the two original .44 Colt toys that Santa is bringing me for Christmas, would a .45 barrel and a .44 special cylinder reemed out to .44 original work?

Justician
Logged
Coffinmaker
Top Active Citizen
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1828


« Reply #31 on: October 24, 2012, 08:37:41 pm »


No.  Original Colt Open Tops and Uberti parts won't mix.  Original Open Tops are .44 Henry Flat Rim Fire.  Have you found a source for rim fire ammunition?Huh

Coffinmaker
Logged
Justician
Very Active Citizen
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 63


« Reply #32 on: October 25, 2012, 10:18:18 am »

I'm sorry, I miscommunicated about this.

I will be receiving two Second Generation 1860s converted to the .44 Colt original caliber.

To turn one of my Uberti 71/72 Opentops into a spare for them, could I buy a .45 barrel then have a .44 special cylinder bored out to accomodate the original Colt .44 caliber bullet (which is really a heel base .45)?

Justician
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] Go Up Print 
Cas City Forum Hall & CAS-L  |  Special Interests - Groups & Societies  |  STORM (Moderator: Major 2)  |  Topic: Soooo, wheres' the 72 44/40's ???? « previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.055 seconds with 21 queries.