Javascript DHTML Drop Down Menu Powered by dhtml-menu-builder.com
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
May 19, 2013, 01:50:01 am
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Search:
Advanced search
Currently there are
0 Users in the Cas City Chat Rooms!
Cas City Forum Hall & CAS-L
|
Special Interests - Groups & Societies
|
The Barracks
|
GAF Regulations
(Moderator:
Pitspitr
) | Topic:
GAF Class Structure and Battle Rifle Standards
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
« previous
next »
Pages:
1
[
2
]
3
Author
Topic: GAF Class Structure and Battle Rifle Standards (Read 21917 times)
Bull Schmitt
Deputy Marshal
Top Active Citizen
Offline
Posts: 838
Re: GAF Class Structure and Battle Rifle Standards
«
Reply #25 on:
November 26, 2008, 08:34:54 pm »
Gentlemen,
Just a thought. If we eliminated the time element from the matches and emphasized accuracy the use of speed loaders would not be an issue. The time element is something we inherited from CAS and may not be appropriate for GAF.
Of course I have been out in left field before.
Col Bull
Logged
Bvt Col Bull Schmitt
GAF Adjutant General
GAF Commander Department of the Atlantic
GAF Webmaster
SCORRS President & Webmaster
SASS #9535, SCORRS, GAF, NRA
www.frontierforge.com
Drydock
GAF #19, BC, CC, SoM Luetenant Colonel, Ordnance MA1 USN (Ret.) SASS 1248 Life
American Plainsmen Society
Top Active Citizen
Offline
Posts: 1563
Re: GAF Class Structure and Battle Rifle Standards
«
Reply #26 on:
November 26, 2008, 10:01:34 pm »
No, this is a combat match, take away the timer and it becomes a target shoot. In combat, speed of engagement is critical, and we are nothing if not a combat scenario oriented outfit.
Logged
Civilize them with a Krag . . .
Bull Schmitt
Deputy Marshal
Top Active Citizen
Offline
Posts: 838
Re: GAF Class Structure and Battle Rifle Standards
«
Reply #27 on:
November 26, 2008, 10:19:19 pm »
I thought I would just run it up the flag pole and see if anyone saluted it. I think you are probably right.
Logged
Bvt Col Bull Schmitt
GAF Adjutant General
GAF Commander Department of the Atlantic
GAF Webmaster
SCORRS President & Webmaster
SASS #9535, SCORRS, GAF, NRA
www.frontierforge.com
Pitspitr
Deputy Marshal
Top Active Citizen
Offline
Posts: 2241
308 214-0082 45551 Rd 816, Sargent NE 68874 USA
Re: GAF Class Structure and Battle Rifle Standards
«
Reply #28 on:
November 27, 2008, 09:09:36 am »
Quote from: Sgt. Drydock on November 26, 2008, 10:01:34 pm
No, this is a combat match, take away the timer and it becomes a target shoot. In combat, speed of engagement is critical, and we are nothing if not a combat scenario oriented outfit.
I agree. I also think we need to incorporate some stages that make you think a little.
Logged
I remain, Your Ob'd Servant,
Jerry M. "Pitspitr" Davenport
(Bvt.)Colonel Commanding,
Dept. of the Missouri,
Grand Army of the Frontier
BC/IT CC SoM Marksman
Bow View Haymaker
Top Active Citizen
Offline
Posts: 671
Re: GAF Class Structure and Battle Rifle Standards
«
Reply #29 on:
November 27, 2008, 07:58:34 pm »
I kind of like the full pistol reloads. I thought I was getting better at it with my Remington conversion by the end of the Grand muster
Logged
Bow View Haymaker
GAF #522
SASS# 67733 (RO 1)
NRA
Paul Arens
www.HighPlainsShootersSupply.com
Shotgun Steve
Top Active Citizen
Offline
Posts: 690
Re: GAF Class Structure and Battle Rifle Standards
«
Reply #30 on:
April 15, 2009, 10:00:56 am »
Hello Gentlemen,
In the GAF list of approved firearms for use in GAF Marksmanship competitions... you have the
Colt 1871-72 OPEN TOP MODEL RIMFIRE listed. As I am sure most everyone here knows that there
are no repros that I am aware of that are made in rimfire. So why is it listed as such?
I am planning on shooting in the Scout catagory using an 1866 Yellow Boy short rifle and an 1871-72 Open
Top both in .44 special caliber but loaded with black powder. Are these two firearms acceptable
in that catagory? Thank you in advance for any help.
Shotgun Steve
Logged
I won't be wronged, I won't be insulted, and I won't be laid a hand on. I don't do these things to other people and I require the same of them."
Home of the Plainsmen
http://lastoftheplainsmen.freeforums.org/index.php
NCOWS# 2910
STORM# 233
GAF# 693
U.S. Army
U.S. Marine Corp
Michigan Army National Guard
Drydock
GAF #19, BC, CC, SoM Luetenant Colonel, Ordnance MA1 USN (Ret.) SASS 1248 Life
American Plainsmen Society
Top Active Citizen
Offline
Posts: 1563
Re: GAF Class Structure and Battle Rifle Standards
«
Reply #31 on:
April 16, 2009, 01:21:22 am »
Yes, both weapons are acceptable. While weapons are often listed in their orginal calibers, the GAF recognizes the need for reasonable caliber substitutions.
Logged
Civilize them with a Krag . . .
Shotgun Steve
Top Active Citizen
Offline
Posts: 690
Re: GAF Class Structure and Battle Rifle Standards
«
Reply #32 on:
April 16, 2009, 12:29:16 pm »
Thanks Sarge. I thought that was the answer I would recieve, but I don't like to assume anything.
Take Care
Shotgun Steve
Logged
I won't be wronged, I won't be insulted, and I won't be laid a hand on. I don't do these things to other people and I require the same of them."
Home of the Plainsmen
http://lastoftheplainsmen.freeforums.org/index.php
NCOWS# 2910
STORM# 233
GAF# 693
U.S. Army
U.S. Marine Corp
Michigan Army National Guard
Texas Lawdog
"Old School" Cop NCOWS SENATOR
Deputy Marshal
Top Active Citizen
Offline
Posts: 11107
" We're all Here because We're not all There".
Re: GAF Class Structure and Battle Rifle Standards
«
Reply #33 on:
June 01, 2009, 02:40:35 pm »
I am in the process of aquiring a Krag rifle for the GAF Muster in the fall. I am not a reloader, so is ammo available in this caliber?
Logged
SASS#47185 RO I ROII NCOWS#2244 BOLD#393 GAF#318 SCORRS#1 SBSS#1485 WASA#666 RATS#111 BOSS#155 Storm#241 Henry 1860#92 W3G#1000 Warthog AZSA #28 American Plainsmen Society #69 Masonic Cowboy Shootist Hiram's Rangers#18 FOP Lt. Col Grand Army of The Frontier, Life Member CAF
Col. CAF NRA TSRA BOA Dooley Gang BOPP ROWSS Scarlet Mask Vigilance Society Cow Cracker Cavalry Berger Sharpshooters "I had no Irons in the Fire". "Are you gonna pull those pistols or whistle Dixie"?
Drydock
GAF #19, BC, CC, SoM Luetenant Colonel, Ordnance MA1 USN (Ret.) SASS 1248 Life
American Plainsmen Society
Top Active Citizen
Offline
Posts: 1563
Re: GAF Class Structure and Battle Rifle Standards
«
Reply #34 on:
June 05, 2009, 11:35:33 am »
Unfortunatly, while Remington and Winchester do make runs of .30 US every year, it is loaded with a 180 jacketed soft point at 2450 FPS. This ammo cannot be used at a GAF shoot, which requires a CAS spec lead bullet (Gas check allowed at Match discretion) at no more than 1400 fps. I'm afraid you either need to reload, or find someone who does.
Logged
Civilize them with a Krag . . .
RattlesnakeJack
NCOWS
Top Active Citizen
Offline
Posts: 1247
Re: GAF Class Structure and Battle Rifle Standards
«
Reply #35 on:
June 05, 2009, 03:12:06 pm »
TL -
Lots of reloading info and components available, if you can find someone to load for you ......
Although original ammunition had jacketed bullets, safety and target preservation dictate use of cast bullets only in this type of shooting, of course ......
There are some commercial custom loaders who offer .30-40 loads, but you would have to ensure that they will do them with cast bullets.
Here is one loader who offers it (Hard Cast Lead 165 gr. bullet; price $30.94/20) -
http://www.customcartridge.com/products/browse_legend.php
Here is one writeup you may find of interest -
http://www.frfrogspad.com/kragrifl.htm
Logged
Rattlesnake Jack Robson, Scout, Rocky Mountain Rangers, North West Canada, 1885
Major John M. Robson, Royal Scots of Canada, 1883-1901
Sgt. John Robson, Queen's Own Rifles of Canada, 1885
Bvt. Col, Commanding International Dept. and Div. of Canada, Grand Army of the Frontier
Old West ClipArt & History Website:
http://www3.memlane.com/gromboug/
RattlesnakeJack
NCOWS
Top Active Citizen
Offline
Posts: 1247
Re: GAF Class Structure and Battle Rifle Standards
«
Reply #36 on:
June 07, 2009, 02:35:05 pm »
Quote from: Sgt. Drydock on June 05, 2009, 11:35:33 am
.... a GAF shoot ..... requires a CAS spec lead bullet (Gas check allowed at Match discretion) .......
Are gas-checked bullets are allowed on the range at Ord for the GAF National Muster?
"And now for the rest of the story ...."
I am pondering a rather significant change of pace this year .... i.e. entering in the Mil-spec Repeater class, and using my .303 'Rifle, Magazine, Lee-Enfield' (MLE) .....
Unfortunately, the bandolier in that photo is actually a rather glaring anachronism .... it is a Pattern 1903 bandolier, designed to accommodate cartridges held in 5-round chargers which came in with the introduction that year of the 'Rifle, Short, Magazine, Lee-Enfield' (i.e. SMLE) The design of the MLE requires the magazine to be charged one cartridge at a time, so the correct accoutrement for it is the Pattern 1888 Bandolier. I do have one of the rather nice reproductions of that bandolier offered by IMA .... just haven't ever gotten around to re-photographing my MLE with it ....
As an aside, here is one image of a Canadian Boer War serviceman with his Magazine Lee-Enfield rifle and revolver (almost certainly either a Colt Model 1878 or Colt New Service) and equipped with a Pattern 1888 bandolier ..... Trooper, Lord Strathcona's Horse -
This Boer War mounted unit was composed mainly of former North West Mounted Police (many of them still actively serving but granted leaves of absence to serve in South Africa) and western stockmen. The unit was raised and equipped at the personal expense of Baron Strathcona and Mount Royal (Scottish-born Canadian financier and politician Sir Donald Smith, former Governor of the Hudspn's Bay Company, and President of the Canadian Pacific Railway Company.)
Lord Strathcona's Horse was commanded by Colonel (later Sir) Samuel Benfield Steele ..... who has been referred to as the "Quintessential Mountie". He was the third man to enroll in the newly formed NWMP in 1873, and held the rank of Superintendent when assigned in 1898 to NWMP command in the Yukon Territory during the Klondike gold rush. In 1899 he was granted leave of absence to serve in the Boer War. Here he is in his uniform as Officer Commanding Lord Strathcona's Horse -
Logged
Rattlesnake Jack Robson, Scout, Rocky Mountain Rangers, North West Canada, 1885
Major John M. Robson, Royal Scots of Canada, 1883-1901
Sgt. John Robson, Queen's Own Rifles of Canada, 1885
Bvt. Col, Commanding International Dept. and Div. of Canada, Grand Army of the Frontier
Old West ClipArt & History Website:
http://www3.memlane.com/gromboug/
Drydock
GAF #19, BC, CC, SoM Luetenant Colonel, Ordnance MA1 USN (Ret.) SASS 1248 Life
American Plainsmen Society
Top Active Citizen
Offline
Posts: 1563
Re: GAF Class Structure and Battle Rifle Standards
«
Reply #37 on:
June 07, 2009, 03:08:34 pm »
You would need to ask Pitspitr that, though I've yet to encounter any problems with the Gas Checks on my .30 US rounds. BTW, was there a carbine version of the MLE? Or the MLM for that matter?
Logged
Civilize them with a Krag . . .
RattlesnakeJack
NCOWS
Top Active Citizen
Offline
Posts: 1247
Re: GAF Class Structure and Battle Rifle Standards
«
Reply #38 on:
June 07, 2009, 10:37:16 pm »
Greetings, Sergeant!
Yes, there were standard carbine versions -
Carbine, Magazine Lee-Metford -
Carbine, Magazine Lee-Enfield -
These carbines were designed for issue to cavalry, primarily, and have no provision for a bayonet. They had shallower 6-round magazines in lieu of the 10-round magazine of the MLM MkII and MLE rifles (the MkI MLM rifle had an 8-round magazine.)
A special "contract carbine" model was produced for New Zealand, starting in 1900 .... these were modified MLM and MLE carbines with a shortened fore-end and nosecap with bayonet mount for the Pattern 1888 bayonet -
Finally, in 1903, a similar contract carbine was produced for the Royal Irish Constabulary -
The Boer War was a great learning experience for the British military - they started out fielding traditional infantry and cavalry for the most part, but as the war progressed mounted infantry proved to be by far the most useful troops for the conditions encountered in South Africa. However, the long infantry-pattern rifle was rather cumbersome for such troops, as will be quite evident in these photos of Canadian Mounted Rifles ....
The standard method of carrying the infantry rifle on horseback, with the butt resting in a "short bucket" and steadied by a strap from the fore-end going around the right arm, is illustrated in these first two photos -
-
To be "at the ready" and able to dismount quickly, the rifle was generally carried in one of these ways -
-
Note that both of the fellows above have regular slings on their rifles. In this image of the 2nd Regiment of Canadian Mounted Rifles on the march, the fellow on the left in front carries his rifle slung over the back, while the man beside him carries his across the saddle pommel (the arm strap is clearly visible dangling from the fore-end of that rifle -
At any rate, the unsuitability of the long rifle for mounted carry and the desire to have a standardized weapon in lieu of rifle and carbine versions resulted in the adoption in 1903 of the "Rifle, Short, Magazine Lee-Enfield" - the renowned "SMLE" which served the British Empire so well during WWI -
Logged
Rattlesnake Jack Robson, Scout, Rocky Mountain Rangers, North West Canada, 1885
Major John M. Robson, Royal Scots of Canada, 1883-1901
Sgt. John Robson, Queen's Own Rifles of Canada, 1885
Bvt. Col, Commanding International Dept. and Div. of Canada, Grand Army of the Frontier
Old West ClipArt & History Website:
http://www3.memlane.com/gromboug/
Drydock
GAF #19, BC, CC, SoM Luetenant Colonel, Ordnance MA1 USN (Ret.) SASS 1248 Life
American Plainsmen Society
Top Active Citizen
Offline
Posts: 1563
Re: GAF Class Structure and Battle Rifle Standards
«
Reply #39 on:
June 08, 2009, 03:47:07 am »
Its interesting that the Americans and British, both engaged in irregular campaigns at the turn of the century, came to the same conclusion at the same time, both developing "Short Rifles" in 1903.
Logged
Civilize them with a Krag . . .
Pitspitr
Deputy Marshal
Top Active Citizen
Offline
Posts: 2241
308 214-0082 45551 Rd 816, Sargent NE 68874 USA
Re: GAF Class Structure and Battle Rifle Standards
«
Reply #40 on:
June 12, 2009, 10:57:19 pm »
I believe gas checks are allowed at Ord But I will need to check with Ned Neiderlander to be certain.
Sgt. Drydock What would be the Battle Rifle ruling on a device similar to the Metcalf device?
Logged
I remain, Your Ob'd Servant,
Jerry M. "Pitspitr" Davenport
(Bvt.)Colonel Commanding,
Dept. of the Missouri,
Grand Army of the Frontier
BC/IT CC SoM Marksman
Drydock
GAF #19, BC, CC, SoM Luetenant Colonel, Ordnance MA1 USN (Ret.) SASS 1248 Life
American Plainsmen Society
Top Active Citizen
Offline
Posts: 1563
Re: GAF Class Structure and Battle Rifle Standards
«
Reply #41 on:
July 08, 2009, 11:08:59 pm »
If it was attached to your belt/person it would be a mode of conveyance, attached to the weapon its a loading aid, and is not allowed.
Logged
Civilize them with a Krag . . .
Pitspitr
Deputy Marshal
Top Active Citizen
Offline
Posts: 2241
308 214-0082 45551 Rd 816, Sargent NE 68874 USA
Re: GAF Class Structure and Battle Rifle Standards
«
Reply #42 on:
July 09, 2009, 06:51:25 am »
That was my guess. Thanks for the reply.
Logged
I remain, Your Ob'd Servant,
Jerry M. "Pitspitr" Davenport
(Bvt.)Colonel Commanding,
Dept. of the Missouri,
Grand Army of the Frontier
BC/IT CC SoM Marksman
voodoo child
Citizen
Offline
Posts: 17
Re: GAF Class Structure and Battle Rifle Standards
«
Reply #43 on:
July 13, 2009, 09:21:57 pm »
i thought of a solution 2 the broomhandle single loading problem why not load some stripper clips with only 1 round of ammo that way you can hold the bolt open 4 loading without risking accidental discharge
Logged
Drydock
GAF #19, BC, CC, SoM Luetenant Colonel, Ordnance MA1 USN (Ret.) SASS 1248 Life
American Plainsmen Society
Top Active Citizen
Offline
Posts: 1563
Re: GAF Class Structure and Battle Rifle Standards
«
Reply #44 on:
July 13, 2009, 09:45:35 pm »
That has allready been discussed, the c96 shooter is allowed one stripper clip to use as he sees fit once the stage has begun. He can use it for a reload, then to manipulate the bolt as needed.
Logged
Civilize them with a Krag . . .
voodoo child
Citizen
Offline
Posts: 17
Re: GAF Class Structure and Battle Rifle Standards
«
Reply #45 on:
July 25, 2009, 03:51:39 pm »
since this is the post with the rules i was curious about what the rules are regarding pistols with detachable stocks can someone use them with the stock attached or do they have to remove it? also is the c96 carbine allowed what class would it be in and does the stripper clip rule for the pistol count for the carbine?
Logged
Drydock
GAF #19, BC, CC, SoM Luetenant Colonel, Ordnance MA1 USN (Ret.) SASS 1248 Life
American Plainsmen Society
Top Active Citizen
Offline
Posts: 1563
Re: GAF Class Structure and Battle Rifle Standards
«
Reply #46 on:
July 26, 2009, 12:24:47 pm »
The c96 is classified as a handgun and will be used as such, you can attach a stock if you want, but it will be used as a handgun to engage handgun targets. Same with any other detachable stock handgun. Permenant stock Hangun caliber revolving carbines such as the Remington are scout class carbines.
The exceedingly rare original Mauser c96 Carbine was never adopted by anyone, and never enjoyed commercial success. it does not fit anywhere well in our genre, thus it is not allowed.
Logged
Civilize them with a Krag . . .
captmack
NCOWS
Top Active Citizen
Offline
Posts: 272
"TX is neither southern nor western. TX is TX"
Re: GAF Class Structure and Battle Rifle Standards
«
Reply #47 on:
September 01, 2009, 01:37:13 pm »
Howdy,
Is there a minimum Handgun caliber for shooting in the Milspec Single Shot category? Is .38 ok or does it need to be .45?
Thanks,
Capt Mack
Logged
Capt Prather Scott "Mack" McLain
Senator
NCOWS Life Member #175
Drydock
GAF #19, BC, CC, SoM Luetenant Colonel, Ordnance MA1 USN (Ret.) SASS 1248 Life
American Plainsmen Society
Top Active Citizen
Offline
Posts: 1563
Re: GAF Class Structure and Battle Rifle Standards
«
Reply #48 on:
September 01, 2009, 05:34:04 pm »
Milspec handguns may be any appropriate Milspec caliber, depending on the weapon. .30 Mauser up to .455 Ely. Appropriate Non Milspec handguns of demonstrated Military use have a minimum bore diameter of .357.
Remember, in the Milspec classes, hanguns should be related in period and usage to the rifle being used. The rifle is the determining factor here. Some pairings may be difficult/impossible to achieve, reasonable substitution is allowed. Example. It can be very hard to find a servicable M1892 New Army to pair with a Krag. An appropriate 41 frame colt (Army Special, Offical Police) is allowed if in Proper configuration (blued, 6" pencil barrel). A Ruger Vaquero is considered an appropriate substitution for a Colt SAA in proper barrel length. While calibers in Milspec classes are to be milspec, resonable substitutions are allowed upon request. If you're reqesting to use a .38 in your class, Consider it granted.
In the Milspec Single shot classes, If you're carrying say an M1873 trapdoor, you should be using a .45 caliber 7 1/2" SAA or Schofield. A .38 SAA would be considered a reasonalble substitution for the shooting compition, Heck, an infantryman not normaly issued a sidearm might well consider a lighter private purchase .38 to carry, say a small top break S&W. A .38 Ruger is a reasonable substitution as well for the shooting compition, but could cost style points (!) in field uniform judging, a component of the Brigade Champion award
No, we're not stitch counters, but it is a consideration.
Logged
Civilize them with a Krag . . .
captmack
NCOWS
Top Active Citizen
Offline
Posts: 272
"TX is neither southern nor western. TX is TX"
Re: GAF Class Structure and Battle Rifle Standards
«
Reply #49 on:
September 02, 2009, 11:33:45 am »
Ok, good deal. I'm bringing my Sharp's carbine and Trapdoor carbine so I'll stick to the .45 SAA & Schofield Russian for handguns. Thanks for the info.
Capt. Mack
Logged
Capt Prather Scott "Mack" McLain
Senator
NCOWS Life Member #175
Pages:
1
[
2
]
3
Cas City Forum Hall & CAS-L
|
Special Interests - Groups & Societies
|
The Barracks
|
GAF Regulations
(Moderator:
Pitspitr
) | Topic:
GAF Class Structure and Battle Rifle Standards
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Cas City
-----------------------------
=> Midway USA's Cowboys
=> Cas City - Site Support & Comments
=> CAS City Classifieds
=> Greetings!
-----------------------------
CAS TOPICS
-----------------------------
=> The Longbranch
=> CAS Matches & Events
===> Archived Matches & Events
=> Shooter's Meeting
=> CAS FAQ
=> The Leather Shop
=> Gun Reviews
=> The Powder Room - CAS reloading
=> The Darksider's Den
===> The Dark Arts
===> SHOTS
=> 1911 & Wild Bunch Shooting
=> NCOWS
=> WESTERN 3 GUN
=> Gunsmithing
-----------------------------
Special Interests - Groups & Societies
-----------------------------
=> Cas City Historical Society
===> The Old Fashioned Way
=> The American Plainsmen Society
=> Zoot Shooters
=> The Cutting Edge
=> The Barracks
===> GAF Regulations
===> GAF After Action Reports
=> Cosie's Corner & Feed Bag
===> The Pantry
=> BOLD Chambers
=> RATS
=> Spencer Shooting Society
=> Colt Firearms
=> USFA CSS
=> Colt SAA Clones
===> Colt Long Gun Clones
=> SCORRS
=> STORM
=> Frontier Iron
=> BROW
===> The BROW Archive
=> 1860 Henry
=> The Winchester Model 1873
=> The Winchester Model 1876
-----------------------------
Regional Topics
-----------------------------
=> Texas
=> Chinook Country
=> Kansas
=> Nebraska
=> CAStm down under
-----------------------------
GENERAL TOPICS
-----------------------------
=> The Shootin' Range
=> Constitutional rights (RKBA)
=> Tall Tales
=> Saddlebag Tales
===> ST Comments
=> Books & Movies
About CasCity.com
*
Contact us
*
Privacy Policy
*
Terms of Use
Loading...