Enter your search terms
Submit search form
www.cascity.com
Web
Javascript DHTML Drop Down Menu Powered by dhtml-menu-builder.com
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
March 14, 2010, 04:19:19 am
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Search:
Advanced search
Currently there are
0 Users in the Cas City Chat Rooms!
Cas City Forum Hall & CAS-L
|
Special Interests - Groups & Societies
|
Cas City Historical Society
(Moderators:
St. George
,
Silver Creek Slim
) | Topic:
Boots vs. Shoes
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
« previous
next »
Pages:
[
1
]
2
3
Author
Topic: Boots vs. Shoes (Read 1240 times)
alexanderom
Citizen
Offline
Posts: 5
Boots vs. Shoes
«
on:
October 30, 2009, 11:50:47 pm »
Happy Halloween, all.
I have been doing a lot of research into my outfit and I've got a question that maybe some of you more well versed fellows might be able to help me with. We always see people portrayed as wearing boots in the West, and in most of the pictures I've seen of the time, this is the case. But what about lace up boots/high shoes (
http://www.gentlemansemporium.com/store/002085.php)?
Would this have been something only an East-Coaster or city folk would have worn? When I lived in Charleston (SC), I saw several Victorian era photos of men wearing sack suits and these types, but would they have been common or seen at all elsewhere?
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Jack
Report to moderator
Logged
Plum Loco
Citizen
Offline
Posts: 21
Re: Boots vs. Shoes
«
Reply #1 on:
October 31, 2009, 10:14:19 am »
Just a opinion
But I belive that the lace ups , in the link [ and surplus civil war brogans ] would have been worn A LOT , by non-cowboy type people .
I can not picture railroad train crews , wearing cowboy boots , especially in the locomotives , or brakemen either .
And the railroad crossed the West to Calif in 1869 .
Just like now , people wore what they could afford to purchase , its as simple as that , and has been for a long long time .
Report to moderator
Logged
River City John
NCOWS Senator
NCOWS
Top Active Citizen
Offline
Posts: 1638
Mr. & Mrs. John Covert
Re: Boots vs. Shoes
«
Reply #2 on:
October 31, 2009, 10:30:00 am »
Plum Loco (another fellow train nut?) is basically on the right track.
A townie occupation, or many other frontier occupations, such as prison or express guards, rivermen, Pinkertons, surveyors, peddlers, etc that would have plied their trade while armed, could all have worn lace-up footwear.
RCJ
Report to moderator
Logged
"I was born by the river in a little tent, and just like the river I've been running ever since." - Sam Cooke
"He who will not look backward with reverence, will not look forward with hope." - Edmund Burke
". . .freedom is not everything or the only thing, perhaps we will put that discovery behind us and comprehend, before it's too late, that without freedom all else is nothing."- G. Warren Nutter
NCOWS #L146
GAF #275
http://www.cascity.com/posseprofiles/River_City_John
Plum Loco
Citizen
Offline
Posts: 21
Re: Boots vs. Shoes
«
Reply #3 on:
October 31, 2009, 10:43:54 am »
he he he you guessed right , G scale "outside"
and a former CW re enactor
Report to moderator
Logged
Roscoe Coles
Top Active Citizen
Offline
Posts: 196
Re: Boots vs. Shoes
«
Reply #4 on:
October 31, 2009, 03:43:46 pm »
I think the profession and social status of your impression will tell the tale. Remember work clothes, of which boots would be a part, were considered to be a bit vulgar, or at least not presentable in any kind of polite society. If you had enough money and desire to buy a sack suit (not just the coat and vest) you probably had the money and the occasion to wear lace up shoes.
I own a pair of lace up shoes that I wear when I am doing a town impression, gambler, dandy etc. They are comfortable and a bit dressy. When I am doing a range impression I wear boots, or sometime brogans depending on what I am up to.
Report to moderator
Logged
Delmonico
Deputy Marshal
Top Active Citizen
Offline
Posts: 22509
Re: Boots vs. Shoes
«
Reply #5 on:
October 31, 2009, 04:17:38 pm »
Lace up boots/shoes were also worn on the range.
They show up quite often in photos, if you look real careful.
Report to moderator
Logged
Delmonico
Mongrel Historian
Always get the water for the coffee upstream from the herd.
Ab Ovo Usque ad Mala
The time has passed so quick, the years all run together now.
Coffee, the Elixar of Life
Professor Marvel
purveyor of useless items to the gentry
Top Active Citizen
Offline
Posts: 274
"Prof Marvel never guesses, he knows!"
Re: Boots vs. Shoes
«
Reply #6 on:
October 31, 2009, 06:32:08 pm »
My thoughts Regarding lace-ups vs pull-on boots
Pull-on boots have been traditionally associated with riders and their work; however due to the amount of leather, precise sizing and skill in the manufacture they are costly and in prior times not necessarily readily available without measuremnt and lead time.
Lace up shoes (which were often also called boots) could be "below the ankle" or "above the ankle". The simplest designs, as exemplified in the U.S. Army issue shows of ca.1812, are very simple to cut and make, (in fact there were no Left or right lasts until perhaps 1818 and left and right lasts were not in great use in the U.S. until post civil war) can cover a wide variety of foot sizes with a given size of shoe (do to the latittude of lace-up design), and were in wide use in a variety of occupations throughout the 19th century.
As our good Delmonico has shown using photographic proof, there is sufficient evidence to substantiate your use of lace-up shoes in whatever occupation.
yhs
prof marvel
Report to moderator
Logged
Professor Marvel's Traveling Apothecary and Fortune Telling Emporium
Purveyor of Patent Remedies, Snake Oil, Cleaning Supplies, Dry Goods, and Picture Postcards
Supplying useless advise for All Occasions
pony express
Top Active Citizen
Offline
Posts: 202
Re: Boots vs. Shoes
«
Reply #7 on:
October 31, 2009, 07:31:30 pm »
In the second picture, it appears that he has a "pliers pocket", about 100 years before modern cargo pants came out with them. But at least no hammer loop!
Report to moderator
Logged
Frenchie
"We have met the enemy and he is us." - Pogo
NCOWS
Top Active Citizen
Offline
Posts: 728
Photo by Julio Zangroniz at 'September Storm' 2007
Re: Boots vs. Shoes
«
Reply #8 on:
October 31, 2009, 10:18:07 pm »
I
love
period photos that challenge the conventional "Hollywood" image of what a Westerner looked like.
During the Civil War you'd see more cavalrymen wearing shoes/bootees/brogans than boots, simply because they were easier and cheaper to get. The Quartermaster Department issued only one style of boot and it was intended for mounted artillerymen; it resembled a square-toed Wellington and looked not at all like a "cowboy boot".
Report to moderator
Logged
Yours, &c.,
Guy 'Frenchie' LaFrance
Collector of Curios & Relics
NCOWS
,
GAF
,
NRA
,
NMLRA
- Acting Lieutenant Commanding, Naval Detachment, Dep't of the Atlantic, Grand Army of the Frontier
Vous pouvez voir par mes vêtements que je ne suis pas un
cowboy.
alexanderom
Citizen
Offline
Posts: 5
Re: Boots vs. Shoes
«
Reply #9 on:
October 31, 2009, 10:27:49 pm »
This is just the kind of information I was hoping for, thank you so much! The concept I had was someone from Charleston who went attended the Citadel and went west with the Cavalry in the '70's and then stayed on out that way after resigining his commission in '75. I don't want to use much military gear or accoutrements because he (like myself, oddly enough) views them to be "work clothes" and wants to take them off as soon as possible when he has the chance. So I'm going for that City kind of a look, something that would be reminiscent of his hometown.
The only thing I plan on using as far as military gear is the Cavalry revolver. Something about the brogans, though...I really like them.
Once again, thank you so much.
Jack
Report to moderator
Logged
Pages:
[
1
]
2
3
Cas City Forum Hall & CAS-L
|
Special Interests - Groups & Societies
|
Cas City Historical Society
(Moderators:
St. George
,
Silver Creek Slim
) | Topic:
Boots vs. Shoes
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Cas City
-----------------------------
=> Midway USA's Cowboys
=> Cas City - Site Support & Comments
=> Greetings!
-----------------------------
CAS TOPICS
-----------------------------
=> The Longbranch
=> Shooter's Meeting
=> CAS FAQ
=> The Leather Shop
=> Gun Reviews
=> CAS Events
=> The Darksider's Den
===> The Dark Arts
=> NCOWS
=> WESTERN 3 GUN
=> Gunsmithing
-----------------------------
Special Interests - Groups & Societies
-----------------------------
=> Cas City Historical Society
===> The Old Fashioned Way
=> The Cutting Edge
=> The Barracks
=> Cosie's Corner & Feed Bag
===> The Pantry
=> BOLD Chambers
=> RATS
=> Spencer Shooting Society
=> USFA CSS
=> SCORRS
=> STORM
=> Frontier Iron
=> BROW
===> The BROW Archive
=> 1860 Henry
=> The Winchester Model 1876
-----------------------------
Regional Topics
-----------------------------
=> Chinook Country
=> Kansas
=> Nebraska
=> CAStm down under
-----------------------------
GENERAL TOPICS
-----------------------------
=> The Shootin' Range
=> Constitutional rights (RKBA)
=> Tall Tales
=> Saddlebag Tales
===> ST Comments
=> Books & Movies
*
About CasCity.com
*
Contact us
*
Loading...