Javascript DHTML Drop Down Menu Powered by dhtml-menu-builder.com
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 21, 2017, 12:28:56 pm

Login with username, password and session length

Search:     Advanced search
* Home FlashChat Help Calendar Login Register
Currently there are 0 Users in the Cas City Chat Rooms!
Cas City Forum Hall & CAS-L  |  Special Interests - Groups & Societies  |  BOLD Chambers (Moderator: California Lawdawg)  |  Topic: President not a fan of Law Enforcement 0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: President not a fan of Law Enforcement  (Read 3718 times)
Fairshake
Shooter of the HOLY BLACK
Top Active Citizen
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 492


« on: July 25, 2009, 08:36:16 pm »


I'm sure that many of you have read or heard the comments by our President concerning the arrest of a black professor in his home. How nice it is to see the President of the USA go onto TV and say that a officer acted stupidly doing his duty. Was he there? How is it that the word of a white officer is suspect and the word of a black professor is true-ful. That is discrimination any way you look at it. We all know what he should have said. This officer had a black partner who is backing him. He also was given a commendation for trying to save a black NBA player with mouth to mouth. How about being the training officer at the academy for race relations. Sad !!! VERY SAD!!!
Logged

Deadwood Marshal  Border Vigilante SASS 81802                                                                         WARTHOG                                                                   NRA                                                                            BOLD So that His place shall never be with those cold and Timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat
Daniel Nighteyes
Top Active Citizen
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1113



« Reply #1 on: July 27, 2009, 09:42:34 pm »

With all due respect (and I mean that), you've just done the very thing you're castigating Obama for doing.  You weren't there; you don't know what Obama knew and was told.  So, perhaps it would be a good idea to back off of this...

-- Nighteyes
Logged
Virginia Gentleman
Top Active Citizen
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1224


Here's a McRib for Allah


« Reply #2 on: July 28, 2009, 09:16:58 am »

Nighteyes, Cut me a major slack burger with cheese and fries!  Obama did what he did to get a friend out of trouble, yet again misusing his office to try to influence events that he did not see happen, nor was what he was told accurate...even if it was he jumped to conclusions and made a statement he should not have.  All you Obama voters should have read the fine print before voting for him. 
Logged

Shotgun Franklin
Top Active Citizen
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2087



« Reply #3 on: July 28, 2009, 09:41:00 am »

obama first said that he did not know the facts then blamed the Cop. I watched the Press Conference, I heard what was said. obama is either a Racist or just assumes the Cops are wrong, either way he was and is wrong.
Logged

Yes, I do have more facial hair now.
Daniel Nighteyes
Top Active Citizen
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1113



« Reply #4 on: July 28, 2009, 10:42:03 am »

... obama is either a Racist or just assumes the Cops are wrong, either way he was and is wrong.

I agree that he was wrong to say anything, and I'm not defending him.  However, to conclude that his statement makes him EITHER a Racist OR a Cop-hater is called binary thinking.  Because it completely precludes the possibility of any other answer, this type of thinking is at the center of a LOT of the world's wrongs and problems.

I understand that you saw the Obama press conference where he made the statement.  Do you also know the details of the event that led up to that statement?  Again, I'm not defending Obama's statement; far from it, in fact.  I'm just curious if you went beyond the statement to see what led up to it.

-- Nighteyes
Logged
Ozark Tracker
Top Active Citizen
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 5424


my granddad on his mule around 1907


« Reply #5 on: July 28, 2009, 11:09:50 am »

from just watchin TV and listening to all the news reports,  I've come to this conclusion.

Ombama assumed a Black Professor   (a personal friend)  would make better decisions than a white Policeman and voiced his opinion.

A Latino woman would make a better decision than a white man and the woman about to be appointed to the Surpreme Court voiced her opinion

I guess it's alright to be a racist, because that's damn sure what'd it be called if a white man made either of those statements about a Black or a Latino.
Logged

We done it for Dixie,  nothing else

"I've traveled a long way and some of the roads weren't paved."
Daniel Nighteyes
Top Active Citizen
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1113



« Reply #6 on: July 28, 2009, 12:55:04 pm »

A Latino woman would make a better decision than a white man and the woman about to be appointed to the Surpreme Court voiced her opinion

Let's be sure we get things right here.  Her exact words were, “I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn’t lived that life.”

The statement isn't about race, but experience.  In fact, one could say the same things about almost any two groups of people.  For example:

“I would hope that a wise Law Enforcement Officer, with the richness of those experiences, would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a citizen who hasn’t had those experiences.”  Is that an elitist statement?  Not one bit.

“I would hope that a wise gun-owner, with the richness of those experiences, would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a non-gun-owner who hasn’t had those experiences.”  Is THAT an elitist statement?  Again, no.

Or how about, “I would hope that a wise woman (or man) with the richness of those experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a man (or woman) who hasn’t lived that life.”  Is that, in either direction, a sexist statement?  Not hardly.

I'll shut up now.
Logged
Texas Lawdog
NCOWS Senator "Old School" Cop
Deputy Marshal
Top Active Citizen
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 14673


" We're all Here because We're not all There".


« Reply #7 on: July 28, 2009, 05:13:48 pm »

Thank You!
Logged

SASS#47185  RO I   ROII       NCOWS#2244  NCOWS Life #186  BOLD#393 GAF#318 SCORRS#1 SBSS#1485  WASA#666  RATS#111  BOSS#155  Storm#241 Henry 1860#92 W3G#1000  Warthog AZSA #28  American Plainsmen Society #69  Masonic Cowboy Shootist  Hiram's Rangers#18  FOP  Lt. Col  Grand Army of The Frontier, Life Member CAF
   Col.  CAF  NRA  TSRA   BOA  Dooley Gang  BOPP  ROWSS  Scarlet Mask Vigilance Society Great Lakes Freight and Mining Company  Cow Cracker Cavalry   Berger Sharpshooters "I had no Irons in the Fire". "Are you gonna pull those pistols or whistle Dixie"?
dutchy
PISTOLARO .
Top Active Citizen
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 639



« Reply #8 on: July 28, 2009, 07:12:04 pm »

TL + 1
Dutchy
Logged

"I'm too old to go soldiering any more , too stiff in the joints to ride point and too dam fat to wrestle drunks Any day they don't pat you on the face with a shovel is a good one"

BOLD 887 
Bvt.Major  Chaplain  GAF  502 
STORM 271 
SASS 87747
CHINOOK COUNTRY


Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
Cas City Forum Hall & CAS-L  |  Special Interests - Groups & Societies  |  BOLD Chambers (Moderator: California Lawdawg)  |  Topic: President not a fan of Law Enforcement « previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.061 seconds with 21 queries.